TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT Review

Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT to other hospitals

Overall Hospital Rating: Not Available ; HCAPS approval: 87%

Database data as of January 31, 2024

A Review of the Data

Prepared by Richard Saunders as of January 31, 2024.

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT, Survey Analysis.)

In the briefest summary, TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in DALLAS, TX. IT HAS NOT BEEN RATED BY CMS . Its type of ownership is Proprietary. The facility's Medicare ID is 450889. It does provide emergency services. There are 77 medical professionals and 26 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT, emergency patients were charged $24,579. This is lower than the state average of $27,898. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.

According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 87% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT, while only 3% did not recommend going to TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT.

The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.

General Information for TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT

Address:

7115 GREENVILLE AVENUE SUITE 100
DALLAS, TX 75231
(214) 647-5300
Click for Map

Medicare Provider Number:

450889

Type:

Acute Care Hospitals

Ownership:

Proprietary

Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT

Overall Rating: Not Available



The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.

Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.

National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.

Overall rating Number of hospitals / Percentage
1 star 198 (6.34%)
2 stars 702 (22.49%)
3 stars 895 (28.68%)
4 stars 895 (28.68%)
5 stars 431 (13.81%)
N/A 1,368 (30.47%)

Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 88 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 3 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 9 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 91 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 1 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 88 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 86 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 86 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 8 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 88 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 83 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 11 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 85 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 9 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 89 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 5 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 6 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 90 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 4 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 6 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 87 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 5 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 8 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 76 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 11 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 13 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 89 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 4 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 7 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 64 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 19 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 17 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 88 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 12 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 88 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 11 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 89 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 27 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 68 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 32 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 61 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 28 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 4 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 68 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 19 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 5 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 76 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 90 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 6 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 4 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 85 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 6 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 9 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 5 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 8 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 87 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 3 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 87 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 10 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable

Cost of TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT: Not Available

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $11
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $14
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $567
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $18,221
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $78
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $2,314
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $331
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $1,308
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $336
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $524
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $65
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $809
Total (Complete Episode) $24,579

Infection Rates at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT

These measures show how often patients at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 31.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.01 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 682.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 0.01 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 682.00 / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 0.10 / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) Not Available / Not Available

How TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in DALLAS, TX

Worst Hospitals in DALLAS, TX

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients 2.5% SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for CABG surgery patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart failure patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for pneumonia patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for stroke patients NA Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate 0.57% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications NA Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.25% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.09% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.47% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 1.55% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 7.53% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 3.25% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 5.01% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate NA Not Enough Data
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 1.09% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.93% SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near TEXAS INSTITUTE FOR SURGERY AT PRESBYTERIAN HOSPIT ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name Overall Rating
The Legacy Midtown Park 5:
Grapevine Medical Lodge 5:
The Belmont at Twin Creeks 5:
Prestonwood Rehabilitation and Nursing Center Inc 5:
Windsor Gardens 5:
Christian Care Center 5:
The Plaza at Edgemere 5:
Ventana By Buckner 5:
Pure Health Transitional Care at Thr Arlington 5:
Continuing Care at Highland Springs 5:
Highland Meadows Health and Rehab 5:
Pure Health Transitional Care at Texas Health Pres 5:
Arbrook Plaza 5:
Villages of Lake Highlands 5:
Good Samaritan Society-Denton Village 5:
Palomino Place 5:
C C Young Memorial Home 5:
Keller Oaks Healthcare Center 4:
Presbyterian Village North Special Care Ctr 4:
Lake Village Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4:
Walnut Place 4:
Caraday Mesquite 4:
Beltline Healthcare Center 4:
Town Hall Estates Arlington Inc 4:
Bear Creek Nursing and Rehabilitation 4:
Town East Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 4:
San Remo 4:
Signature Pointe 4:
Belterra Health and Rehab 4:
Vista Ridge Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4:
Denton Rehabilitation and Nursing Center 4:
Parkwood Healthcare Community 4:
Ashford Hall 4:
Forum Parkway Health and Rehabilitation 4:
La Dora Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 4:
Good Samaritan Society -- Lake Forest Village 4:
Life Care Center of Plano 4:
The Healthcare Resort of Plano 4:
The Legacy at Willow Bend 3:
Rambling Oaks Courtyard Extensive Care Community 3:
Ridgecrest Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 3:
The Lennwood Nursing and Rehabilitation 3:
Stonemere Rehabilitation Center 3:
Hollymead 3:
The Manor at Seagoville 3:
Brentwood Place Three 3:
Rowlett Health and Rehabilitation Center 3:
Prairie Estates 3:
Beacon Harbor Healthcare and Rehabilitation 3:
Accel at Willow Bend 3:
The Rehabilitation and Wellness Centre of Dallas LLC 3:
Le Reve Rehabilitation and Memory Care 3:
The Pavilion at Creekwood 3:
Crestview Court 3:
Heritage Gardens Rehabilitation and Healthcare 3:
The Madison On Marsh 3:
Balch Springs Nursing Home 3:
Mckinney Healthcare and Rehabilitation Center 3:
Cottonwood Creek Healthcare Community 3:
Farmersville Health and Rehabilitation 3:
Lexington Medical Lodge 3:
Heritage at Turner Park Health and Rehab 3:
Bedford Wellness and Rehabilitation 3:
Irving Nursing and Rehabilitation 3:
Greenbrier Health Care Center 3:
Traymore Nursing Center 3:
Methodist Transitional Care Center-Desoto LLC 3:
Matlock Place Health and Rehabilitation Center 3:
Northgate Plaza 2:
Williamsburg Village Healthcare Campus 2:
Mesquite Tree Nursing Center 2:
Westridge Nursing and Rehabilitation 2:
Five Points at Lake Highlands Nursing and Rehab 2:
Las Brisas Rehabilitation and Wellness Suites 2:
Advanced Health and Rehab Center of Garland 2:
City of Ennis Dba Broadmoor Medical Lodge 2:
Cross Timbers Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center 2:
Senior Care Health and Rehabilitation Center - Dal 2:
Park Village Healthcare and Rehabilitation 2:
The Highlands Guest Care Center LLC 2:
Edgewood Rehabilitation and Care Center 2:
Garnet Hill Rehabilitation and Skilled Care 2:
Brookhaven Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2:
The Laurenwood Nursing and Rehabilitation 2:
Brentwood Place Two 2:
Lakewest Rehabilitation and Skilled Care 2:
Brentwood Place Four 2:
Simpson Place 2:
Willowbend Nursing and Rehabilitation Center 2:
Landmark of Plano Rehabilitation and Nursing Cente 2:
Carrara 2:
Green Oaks Nursing and Rehabilitation 2:
Remington Transitional Care of Richardson 2:
The Villages of Dallas 2:
The Hillcrest of North Dallas 2:
Arapaho Rehabilitation and Care Center 2:
Lancaster Ltc Partners Inc 2:
Desoto Ltc Partners, Inc 2:
Hurst Plaza Nursing and Rehab 2:
The Villa at Mountain View 2: