OROVILLE HOSPITAL Review
Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare OROVILLE HOSPITAL to other hospitals
Overall Hospital Rating: ; HCAPS approval: 74%
Database data as of January 31, 2024
A Review of the Data
Prepared by Richard Saunders as of January 31, 2024.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of OROVILLE HOSPITAL. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with OROVILLE HOSPITAL, Survey Analysis.)
In the briefest summary, OROVILLE HOSPITAL is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in OROVILLE, CA. Its five star rating is 1 . Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 50030. It does provide emergency services. There are 590 medical professionals and 161 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at OROVILLE HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $20,344. This is lower than the state average of $26,501. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.
According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 74% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended OROVILLE HOSPITAL, while only 5% did not recommend going to OROVILLE HOSPITAL.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for OROVILLE HOSPITAL
Address:
2767 OLIVE HIGHWAY
OROVILLE, CA
95966
(530) 533-8500
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
50030
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Voluntary non-profit - Private
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for OROVILLE HOSPITAL
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for OROVILLE HOSPITAL summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
---|---|
1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for OROVILLE HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.
Survey Question | Response |
---|---|
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 65 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 10 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 25 % |
Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 74 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 7 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 19 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 59 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 12 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 29 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 62 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 12 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 26 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 66 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 12 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 22 % |
Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 75 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 8 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 17 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 63 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 14 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 23 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 60 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 14 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 26 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 48 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 22 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 30 % |
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 44 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 24 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 32 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 51 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 20 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 29 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 52 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 25 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 23 % |
Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 64 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 15 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 21 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 41 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 35 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 24 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 21 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 79 % |
Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 24 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 76 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 18 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 82 % |
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 51 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 11 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 38 % |
Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 55 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 17 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 28 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 50 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 12 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 38 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 46 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 7 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 47 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 55 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 20 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 25 % |
Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 30 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 30 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 40 % |
Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 20 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 33 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 47 % |
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 17 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 40 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 43 % |
Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 80 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 4 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 16 % |
Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 90 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 2 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 8 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 76 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 4 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 20 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 74 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 6 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 20 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 84 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 4 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 12 % |
Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 90 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 3 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 7 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 84 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 5 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 11 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 79 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 4 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 17 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 64 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 11 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 25 % |
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 66 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 9 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 25 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 63 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 13 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 24 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 70 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 12 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 18 % |
Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 82 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 5 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 13 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 58 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 19 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 23 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 13 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 87 % |
Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 16 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 84 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 11 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 89 % |
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 34 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 5 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 61 % |
Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 44 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 7 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 49 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 35 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 5 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 60 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 24 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 3 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 73 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 70 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 11 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 19 % |
Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 52 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 17 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 31 % |
Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 7 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 24 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 69 % |
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 5 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 74 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 21 % |
Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Cost of OROVILLE HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the OROVILLE HOSPITAL provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for OROVILLE HOSPITAL: Not Available
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at OROVILLE HOSPITAL:
Type | Amount |
---|---|
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $5 |
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $53 |
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $118 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $8 |
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $12 |
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $453 |
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $9,961 |
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $20 |
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $935 |
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $219 |
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $115 |
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $3,710 |
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $886 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $2,769 |
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $145 |
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $935 |
Total (Complete Episode) | $20,344 |
Infection Rates at OROVILLE HOSPITAL
These measures show how often patients at OROVILLE HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.
Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
---|---|
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.19 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 3.77 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 2,194.00 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 1.75 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 2.00 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | 1.14 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.30 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.79 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 7,917.00 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 6.20 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 5.00 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | 0.81 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 30.00 / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 0.87 / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 4.00 / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | 42.00 / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | 0.42 / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | 1.00 / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.03 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | 2.50 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 43,701.00 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 1.98 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 1.00 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia | 0.51 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.45 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.14 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 43,701.00 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 24.38 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 18.00 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 0.74 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.32 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.92 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 5,672.00 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 5.77 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 5.00 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | 0.87 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.01 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.82 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 5,616.00 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 6.01 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 1.00 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | 0.17 / Better |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Colon Surgery | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia | Not Available / Not Available |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | Not Available / Not Available |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | Not Available / Not Available |
How OROVILLE HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how OROVILLE HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Worst Hospitals in OROVILLE, CA
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at OROVILLE HOSPITAL
Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
---|---|---|
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | 3.9% | SAME |
Death rate for heart attack patients | 12.3% | SAME |
Death rate for CABG surgery patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
Death rate for COPD patients | 7% | SAME |
Death rate for heart failure patients | 7.2% | Better |
Death rate for pneumonia patients | 14.6% | Better |
Death rate for stroke patients | 13.4% | SAME |
Pressure ulcer rate | 0.15% | SAME |
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | 168.67% | SAME |
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.23% | SAME |
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.09% | SAME |
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 1.74% | SAME |
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.66% | SAME |
Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 12.23% | SAME |
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 2.16% | SAME |
Postoperative sepsis rate | 6.41% | SAME |
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 1.63% | SAME |
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 0.97% | SAME |
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 0.94% | SAME |
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | 3.8% | SAME |
Death rate for heart attack patients | 12% | SAME |
Death rate for CABG surgery patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
Death rate for COPD patients | 9.3% | SAME |
Death rate for heart failure patients | 6.1% | Better |
Death rate for pneumonia patients | 13.9% | SAME |
Death rate for stroke patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
Pressure ulcer rate | 1.16% | SAME |
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | 165.82% | SAME |
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.33% | SAME |
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.1% | SAME |
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 2.04% | SAME |
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.36% | SAME |
Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 8.45% | SAME |
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 3.56% | SAME |
Postoperative sepsis rate | 4.79% | SAME |
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 1.76% | SAME |
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 1.16% | SAME |
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 1.11% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near OROVILLE HOSPITAL
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near OROVILLE HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Groups Affiliated with OROVILLE HOSPITAL
There are 590 doctors and 161 medical groups that are affiliated with OROVILLE HOSPITAL.
Affiliated Doctor Groups
- OROHEALTH CORPORATION A NON PROFIT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
- SHASTA REGIONAL MEDICAL GROUP INC
- CORNERSTONE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATES
- OROVILLE HOSPITAL
- ELITE UROLOGY OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA LLC
- REEDLEY COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
- ADVENTIST HEALTH PHYSICIANS NETWORK
- SHASTA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER
- ORCHARD HOSPITAL
- CORONA HOSPITALIST MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER
- AMPLA HEALTH
- FEATHER RIVER TRIBAL HEALTH INC
- ADVANCED RADIOLOGY AND INTERVENTIONAL ASSOCIATES INC
- PARAGON CHICO MEDICAL GROUP INC
- ST LUKES CLINIC LLC
- ACADIANA RADIOLOGY GROUP
- WAYNE RADIOLOGISTS PA
- X-RAY PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION
- COLUMBUS RADIOLOGY PHYSICIANS LLC
- CUMBERLAND IMAGING ASSOCIATES PC
- RADIOLOGY GROUP OF ABINGTON PC
- JASON L HWANG MD INC
- SIMI RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING MEDICAL GROUP
- SOUTH FLORIDA MEDICAL IMAGING PA
- MEDICAL IMAGING ASSOCIATES OF IDAHO FALLS INC
- TENNESSEE VALLEY RADIOLOGY LLC
- DIRECT RADIOLOGY PLLC
- INTERCITY RADIOLOGY PC
- ENLOE SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS, INC
- THE PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL
- DIGNITY HEALTH MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- MANGROVE MEDICAL GROUP
- HANCOCK REGIONAL HOSPITAL
- HANCOCK PHYSICIAN NETWORK, LLC
- SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- ROLLING HILLS CLINIC
- COMPREHENSIVE RENAL CARE GROUP A MEDICAL CORPORATION
- HODARI MD DERMATOLOGY, INC.
- GARDENS RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES PA
- ELLIS BANDT BIRKIN KOLLINS AND WONG PLLC
- SISKIYOU HOSPITAL INC
- SIERRA NEVADA PRIMARY CARE PHYSICIANS A MEDICAL CORPORATION
- KETTERING NETWORK RADIOLOGISTS INC
- BROCK S CUMMINGS MD INC
- GALEN INPATIENT PHYSICIANS PC
- NORTH VALLEY NEPHROLOGY INC
- BOUCHIER-PRITCHETT FAMILY MEDICINE PC
- ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA A MEDICAL GROUP
- NORTHERN VALLEY INDIAN HEALTH INC
- INTEGRATIVE SPORTS AND SPINE INC
- HAYS MEDICAL CENTER INC
- DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
- BUOYANT PRIMARY CARE
- MISSION RANCH PRIMARY CARE INC
- SHASTA EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- DOCTORS ON DUTY MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CA
- HAZEL HAWKINS MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- SUMMIT NEPHROLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA
- FRANKLIN M CHU MD INC
- KOOTENAI HEALTH, INC.
- BASS MEDICAL GROUP
- NORTH VALLEY GASTROENTEROLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- CLAYDON MEDICAL GROUP INC
- DIGNITY HEALTH
- JAVIDAN UROLOGY INC
- SIERRA MEDICAL PARTNERSHIP
- NORTHSTATE FOOT AND ANKLE SPECIALIST INC
- REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
- DOCS MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SIERRA RHEUMATOLOGY INC, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
- CATHOLIC HEALTH INITIATIVES COLORADO
- ADVANCED DERMATOLOGY AND SKIN CANCER SPECIALISTS
- FLORENCE MEDICAL GROUP OF CALIFORNIA II PC
- FLORENCE MEDICAL GROUP OF CALIFORNIA PC
- PARADISE MEDICAL GROUP INC
- GLENN MEDICAL CENTER, LLC
- GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL CORPORATION
- RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF NORTHERN KENTUCKY PLLC
- GRASS VALLEY RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- SHASTA ORTHOPEDICS AND SPORTS MEDICINE A MEDICAL CORPORATION
- JACK W FINCH, MD, INC
- NORTHSTATE CARDIOLOGY CONSULTANTS
- SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- CATALYST NEUROMEDICAL CENTER PC
- MUNDH NP AND GARRETSON MD MEDICAL CORPORATION
- GRASS VALLEY EXTENDED CARE INC
- KULDIP GILL M D P C
- RADIATION ONCOLOGY NETWORK OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
- ENLOE HEALTH AND WELLNESS
- M D IMAGING INC
- REGIONAL RADIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES INC A MEDICAL GROUP
- COUNTY OF BUTTE
- RENAISSANCE IMAGING MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- CHAVEZ EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC
- AMERICAN SPECIALTY PHYSICIANS GROUP INC
- REDDING FAMILY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- CENTRA MEDICAL GROUP LLC
- CARILION MEDICAL CENTER
- FAMILIES FIRST HEALTH AND WELLNESS CENTER INC
- BAYCARE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH ASSOCIATES, LLC
- COUNTY OF MONTEREY
- VESTA TELEMEDICINE SOLUTIONS PC
- ADVANCED IMAGING CENTER, INC.
- MOHAMED H KHAN MD INC
- MOUNTAIN VIEW FAMILY MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- SHASTA CRITICAL CARE SPECIALISTS MEDICAL CLINIC INC
- REDDING CRITICAL CARE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- GOOD SHEPHERD HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
- ACTIVE LIFE WOUND CLINICS
- COMMUNICARE HEALTH CENTERS
- FAST PACE MEDICAL CLINIC PLLC
- WOODLAND EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC
- ERIC L ELLIS MD INC
- LEENA SINGH MD INC
- LOGAN HEALTH - SHELBY
- CHANDAN DS CHEEMA MD INC
- RIDGE EYE CARE INC
- STANFORD HEALTH CARE
- SONORA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
- NORTHSTATE PLASTIC SURGERY ASSOCIATES INC
- QUANTUM HEALTHCARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- NEPOMUCENO HOSPITAL GROUP INC
- VITUITY HOSPITALISTS PC
- CHICO DERMATOLOGY INC
- PLATINUM HOSPITALISTS LLP
- PALM DESERT RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- CEP AMERICA - CALIFORNIA
- REDDING UROLOGIC ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORP
- MODESTO RADIOLOGICAL MEDICAL GROUP INC
- TURLOCK IMAGING SERVICES, LLC
- SOLANO HEMATOLOGY - ONCOLOGY
- MAIMONIDES MEDICAL CENTER - MMC RADIOLOGY FPP
- ASPIRUS RHINELANDER AND TOMAHAWK HOSPITALS AND CLINICS INC
- BERMAN SKIN INSTITUTE MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SHINGLE SPRINGS RANCHERIA
- PROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- UCSF MEDICAL GROUP BUSINESS SERVICES
- HEART AND VASCULAR CENTERS OF AMERICA
- EMERGENCY AND ACUTE CARE MEDICAL CORPORATION
- RANDAL SLOOP MD INC
- ORANGE COUNTY UROLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC. A MEDICAL GROUP
- KAANAPALI MEDICAL SERVICES INC
- COMMUNITY HEALTH PARTNERS
- NICK-DUNG M TRAN MEDICAL CORPORATION
- HANFORD COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
- DOCTORS IN INC
- AURORA MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
- EAST BAY CENTER FOR DIGESTIVE HEALTH MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- CARES COMMUNITY HEALTH
- HEALTH FIRST MEDICAL GROUP LLC
- RIDEOUT MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- SUTTER BUTTES IMAGING MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- SUTTER VALLEY HOSPITALS
- REGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA UCSF
- DIDI HIRSCH PSYCHIATRIC SERVICE
- SONNTAG REEVE EYE CENTER INC
The list of medical professionals associated with OROVILLE HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with OROVILLE HOSPITAL.