SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER Review
Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER to other hospitals
Overall Hospital Rating: ; HCAPS approval: 77%
Database data as of January 31, 2024
A Review of the Data
Prepared by Richard Saunders as of January 31, 2024.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, Survey Analysis.)
In the briefest summary, SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in ROSEVILLE, CA. Its five star rating is 5 . Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 50309. It does provide emergency services. There are 1,011 medical professionals and 163 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, emergency patients were charged $23,332. This is lower than the state average of $26,501. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.
According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 77% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, while only 6% did not recommend going to SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Address:
ONE MEDICAL PLAZA
ROSEVILLE, CA
95661
(916) 781-1000
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
50309
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Voluntary non-profit - Private
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
---|---|
1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER to the national results for similar facilities.
Survey Question | Response |
---|---|
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 76 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 5 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 19 % |
Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 83 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 3 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 14 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 73 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 5 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 22 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 72 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 6 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 22 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 75 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 7 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 18 % |
Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 82 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 5 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 13 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 74 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 8 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 18 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 69 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 8 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 23 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 63 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 10 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 27 % |
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 62 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 9 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 29 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 64 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 10 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 26 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 57 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 24 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 19 % |
Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 70 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 12 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 18 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 45 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 35 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 20 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 15 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 85 % |
Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 16 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 84 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 13 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 87 % |
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 45 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 6 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 49 % |
Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 48 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 8 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 44 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 46 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 6 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 48 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 39 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 5 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 56 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 70 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 10 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 20 % |
Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 48 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 16 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 36 % |
Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 8 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 18 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 74 % |
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 6 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 77 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 17 % |
Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Cost of SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER: Not Available
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER:
Type | Amount |
---|---|
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $22 |
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $2 |
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $48 |
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $148 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $11 |
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $9 |
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $778 |
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $11,280 |
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $27 |
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $1,612 |
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $938 |
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $384 |
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $3,091 |
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $832 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $2,688 |
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $138 |
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,324 |
Total (Complete Episode) | $23,332 |
Infection Rates at SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
These measures show how often patients at SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.
Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
---|---|
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.07 / Better |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.71 / Better |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 13,015.00 / Better |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 11.50 / Better |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 3.00 / Better |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | 0.26 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 1.29 / Worse |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 3.11 / Worse |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 10,697.00 / Worse |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 9.76 / Worse |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 20.00 / Worse |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | 2.05 / Worse |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.38 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | 1.94 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 232.00 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 6.42 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 6.00 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery | 0.93 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | -- / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | 2.74 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | 139.00 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | 1.10 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | 0.00 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.26 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | 1.58 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 117,115.00 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 7.01 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 5.00 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia | 0.71 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.16 / Better |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.43 / Better |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 109,485.00 / Better |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 59.52 / Better |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 16.00 / Better |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 0.27 / Better |
How SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Top Hospitals in ROSEVILLE, CA
Worst Hospitals in ROSEVILLE, CA
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
---|---|---|
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | 3.5% | SAME |
Death rate for heart attack patients | 12.1% | SAME |
Death rate for CABG surgery patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
Death rate for COPD patients | 10.7% | SAME |
Death rate for heart failure patients | 13.6% | SAME |
Death rate for pneumonia patients | 18% | SAME |
Death rate for stroke patients | 13.4% | SAME |
Pressure ulcer rate | 0.16% | SAME |
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | 154.62% | SAME |
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.21% | SAME |
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.1% | SAME |
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 2.31% | SAME |
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.65% | SAME |
Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 6.32% | SAME |
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 5.47% | Worse |
Postoperative sepsis rate | 4.75% | SAME |
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 1.63% | SAME |
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 1.52% | SAME |
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 0.88% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Groups Affiliated with SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER
There are 1,011 doctors and 163 medical groups that are affiliated with SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER.
Affiliated Doctor Groups
- SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- DIGNITY HEALTH
- INTEGRATED DERMATOLOGY OF LINCOLN PC
- HOSPITALIST MEDICINE PHYSICIANS OF CALIFORNIA INC
- PULMONARY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES MEDICAL GROUP INC.
- STARLIGHT INPATIENT SERVICES A MEDICAL CORPORATION
- MARSHALL MEDICAL CENTER
- WAEL ASI MD PA
- SIERRA ROSE FAMILY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP
- CENTRAL ANESTHESIA SERVICE EXCHANGE MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- NORTHBAY HEALTHCARE GROUP
- CAPITOL INTERNAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES
- GALEN INPATIENT PHYSICIANS PC
- EMERGENCY NEUROSURGERY SERVICES MEDICAL GROUP INC
- B BARRY CHEHRAZI MD INC
- ERIC L ELLIS MD INC
- FIRST CHOICE PHYSICIAN PARTNERS
- COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
- NORTH STAR GV LP
- NORTH STAR MRI LP
- CHICO EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC
- CEP AMERICA - CALIFORNIA
- DIGNITY HEALTH MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- KALI S ESWARAN MD INC
- CAPITOL NEPHROLOGY MEDICAL GROUP
- QUANTUM BAY AREA HOSPITALIST MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SAYED A. HUSSAIN M.D. INC.
- SACRAMENTO HEART AND VASCULAR MEDICAL
- ROCKLIN FAMILY PRACTICE AND SPORTS MEDICINE
- CAPITAL FOOT AND ANKLE, A PODIATRY CORPORATION
- PACIFIC HEMATOLOGY ONCOLOGY ASSOC.
- SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- PHYSICIAN SERVICES AT EL CAMINO HOSPITAL
- PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SACRAMENTO EAR NOSE AND THROAT SURGICAL AND MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SUMMIT NEPHROLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- GILL AND BISLA INTERNAL MED BISLA HARINDER GEN PTR
- VITUITY-CALIFORNIA OBSERVATION SERVICES PC
- 24 ON PHYSICIANS PC
- TRAUMA MEDICAL GROUP OF ROSEVILLE INC
- SIERRA MEDICAL PARTNERSHIP
- PLACER PRIVATE PHYSICIANS INC
- INTEGRATIVE SPORTS AND SPINE INC
- HEALTHCARE PARTNERS AFFILIATES MEDICAL GROUP
- UROGYNECOLOGY CONSULTANTS MEDICAL CORPORATION
- PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT SURGICAL ASSIST INC
- DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- REGENTS OF THE UNIV OF CA
- DOCTORS IN INC
- CAPITOL GASTROENTEROLOGY CONSULTANTS MEDICAL GROUP INC
- BENEFIS HOSPITALS INC
- STANFORD HEALTH CARE
- REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
- ROBERT F SHAPIRO MD INC AND KENNETH B WIESNER MD INC PTR
- LINCOLN MEDICAL PRACTICE INC
- CAPITAL ALLERGY AND RESPIRATORY DISEASE CENTER A MED CORP
- ORTHOPEDIC TRAUMA SURGEONS OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
- SOUTHERN IDAHO HEALTH PARTNERS LLC
- SIERRA HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY MEDICAL CENTER
- SACRAMENTO COLON AND RECTAL SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- JAVIDAN UROLOGY INC
- SACSOLANO ANESTHESIA EXCHANGE MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- CHICO PODIATRY GROUP
- DISCOVER HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP 2 INC
- WEST COAST MEDICAL CARE PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
- ADVENTIST HEALTH PHYSICIANS NETWORK
- PALTM MEDICAL CORPORATION
- KULDIP GILL M D P C
- VALLEY CANCER MEDICAL CENTER INC
- SIERRA RHEUMATOLOGY INC, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
- ALL INCLUSIVE MEDICAL SERVICES INC
- ALL INCLUSIVE MEDICAL SERVICES URGENT CARE, INC
- ROSEVILLE CARDIOLOGY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
- FOLSOM LAKE PRIMARY CARE PC
- INPATIENT SPECIALISTS OF CALIFORNIA PC
- SACRAMENTO KNEE AND SPORTS MEDICINE MEDICAL CORPORATION
- PEACH TREE HEALTHCARE
- HEALTHY LIVING PRIMARY CARE INC
- MEDICAL VISION TECHNOLOGY OPHTHALMOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- NORTHERN CALIFORNIA ORTHOPEDIC CENTERS MEDICAL GROUP
- FOLSOM ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY AND SPORTS INJURY MEDICAL CLINIC, INC.
- ROSEVILLE DERMATOLOGY INC
- ROSEVILLE ORTHOPEDIC GROUP A MEDICAL CORP
- ZEAM MEDICAL GROUP INC
- TAHOE FOREST HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- ENLOE MEDICAL CENTER
- ARMSTRONG COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- NATOMAS FAMILY PRACTICE
- GASTROENTEROLOGY MEDICAL CLINIC
- RAHMA HEALTH
- RIVER OAKS MEDICAL GROUP INC
- HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF NORTHERN CALIFORNIA
- BAY IMAGING CONSULTANTS MEDICAL GROUP INC
- QUANTUM NEUROMONITORING CORPORATION
- CHAPA-DE INDIAN HEALTH PROGRAM, INC.
- LINCOLN MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- CHRISTUS TRINITY CLINIC
- KELADA PHYSICIANS GROUP INC
- NORTH VALLEY GASTROENTEROLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- BAY AREA FOOT CARE INC
- SPINE AND NERVE DIAGNOSTIC CENTER
- HANSEN KWOK MD INC
- TRAVIS LOIDOLT D.O. INC
- NORTHERN VALLEY INDIAN HEALTH INC
- MIDTOWN INTERNAL MEDICINE GROUP
- ELK GROVE URGENT CARE INC
- FOLSOM URGENT CARE INC
- NATOMAS URGENT CARE INC
- CAPITOL URGENT CARE INC
- CARES COMMUNITY HEALTH
- ANANT LODHIA MD INC
- GRIFFIN AND REED A MEDICAL CORPORATION
- PRESBYTERIAN HEALTHCARE SERVICES
- VISTA COMPLETE CARE INC
- HALO MEDICAL GROUP
- HOSPITALIST PHYSICIANS OF NEW JERSEY PA
- NJ ACUTE CARE SPECIALISTS PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
- PRACTICE ASSOCIATES MEDICAL GROUP
- QUANTUM HEALTHCARE MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- ALPINE ALLERGY AND ASTHMA ASSOCIATES INC
- WELLSPACE HEALTH
- CIRA MICHIGAN PC
- CENTRAL ILLINOIS RADIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES LTD
- VITREO-RETINAL MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- TEAM PHYSICIANS OF CALIFORNIA MEDICAL GROUP INC
- QUALITY CARE SOLUTION INC
- SAN JOAQUIN FACULTY MEDICAL GROUP
- COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
- KANSAS UNIVERSITY PHYSICIANS, INC.
- NEDLEY CLINIC P C
- WEIMAR MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- VALLEY HOSPITALIST MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- OROHEALTH CORPORATION A NON PROFIT HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
- SENIOR CARE CLINIC HOUSE CALLS
- APOLLO PHYSICANS MEDICAL GROUP
- COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS OF AMERICA
- ARNOLD GREENBERG MD INC
- PHOENIXVILLE CLINIC COMPANY LLC
- ST LUKE'S PHYSICIAN GROUP INC
- OAK HILLS MEDICAL CORPORATION
- TRG, LLC
- ASSOCIATES IN WOMENS HEALTH CARE
- SUTTER VALLEY HOSPITALS
- CEP AMERICA - INTENSIVISTS PC
- COLUMBUS INPATIENT CARE INC.
- GRASS VALLEY EXTENDED CARE INC
- PACIFIC INPATIENT MEDICAL GROUP
- TYLER G SMITH MD A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
- SOCKOLOV AND SOCKOLOV A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
- TURNURE MEDICAL GROUP INC
- PEACEHEALTH
- ERIC TEPPER, MD
- SMH PHYSICIAN SERVICES INC
- PENSACOLA HOSPITALIST PHYSICIANS LLC
- CALIFORNIA ADVANCED IMAGING MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- PRIMA MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- NICK-DUNG M TRAN MEDICAL CORPORATION
- HUMAN TOUCH BEHAVIORAL HEALTH INC
- AUBURN MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- RIDEOUT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- WAHIDULLAH MEDICAL CORPORATION
- REDWOOD FOCUSED CARE CLINICS
- RANCHO CORDOVA MEDICAL CLINIC AND URGENT CARE
The list of medical professionals associated with SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with SUTTER ROSEVILLE MEDICAL CENTER.