FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER Review
Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER to other hospitals
Overall Hospital Rating: Not Available ; HCAPS approval: 78%
Database data as of January 31, 2024
A Review of the Data
Prepared by Richard Saunders as of January 31, 2024.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, Survey Analysis.)
In the briefest summary, FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in YPSILANTI, MI. IT HAS NOT BEEN RATED BY CMS . Its type of ownership is Government - Hospital District or Authority. The facility's Medicare ID is 230144. It DOES NOT provide emergency services. There are 20 medical professionals and 11 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. We do not have data on average costs for care provided at FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER.
According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 78% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, while only 3% did not recommend going to FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
Address:
135 S PROSPECT ST
YPSILANTI, MI
48198
(734) 547-4700
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
230144
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Government - Hospital District or Authority
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
Overall Rating: Not Available
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
| Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
|---|---|
| 1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
| 2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
| 3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
| N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER to the national results for similar facilities.
| Survey Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 89 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 1 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 10 % |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 92 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 0 |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 89 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 1 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 86 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 3 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 11 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 88 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 3 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 9 % |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 93 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 2 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 5 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 87 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 3 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 84 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 4 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 12 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 89 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 2 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 9 % |
| Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 93 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 0 |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 86 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 4 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 65 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 24 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 11 % |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 82 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 48 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 37 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 15 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 11 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 89 % |
| Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 15 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 85 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 93 % |
| Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 32 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 6 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 62 % |
| Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 42 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 6 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 52 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 31 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 1 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 68 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 26 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 9 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 65 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 71 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 14 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 15 % |
| Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 87 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 1 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 12 % |
| Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 4 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 17 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 79 % |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 3 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 78 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 19 % |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Cost of FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER: Not Available
We do not have detailed cost analysis for FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER.
Infection Rates at FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
These measures show how often patients at FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.
| Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 280.00 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 0.16 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 182.00 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 0.06 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 871.00 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 0.01 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia | Not Available / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 871.00 / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 0.10 / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 1.00 / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | Not Available / Not Available |
How FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Top Hospitals in YPSILANTI, MI
Worst Hospitals in YPSILANTI, MI
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
| Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for heart attack patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for COPD patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for heart failure patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for stroke patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Pressure ulcer rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.25% | SAME |
| In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.09% | SAME |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 2.48% | SAME |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.57% | SAME |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 8.55% | SAME |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 3.6% | SAME |
| Postoperative sepsis rate | 5.23% | SAME |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 2% | SAME |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 1.08% | SAME |
| CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 0.98% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Groups Affiliated with FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
There are 20 doctors and 11 medical groups that are affiliated with FOREST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER.
Affiliated Doctor Groups
- HURON OPHTHALMOLOGY PC
- BLUE SKY VISION EYE CARE PC
- MICHIGAN PAIN SPECIALISTS, PLLC
- ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF ANN ARBOR PLLC
- MID MICHIGAN EYE CARE CENTER PC
- TRIDENT ANESTHESIA GROUP LLC
- HURON GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES P.C.
- BOTSFORD GENERAL HOSPITAL
- NORTHSTAR ANESTHESIA OF MICHIGAN III PLLC
- JAMOKAY TAYLOR PC
- HOSPITAL CONSULTANTS PC
Affiliated Doctors
- JOHN BARLETTA ( OPHTHALMOLOGY - BLUE SKY VISION EYE CARE PC )
- LOUIS BOJRAB ( INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT - MICHIGAN PAIN SPECIALISTS, PLLC )
- PETER BOZEMAN ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF ANN ARBOR PLLC )
- ELIZABETH CALLAN ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT )
- JOHN CHATAS ( INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT - MICHIGAN PAIN SPECIALISTS, PLLC )
- VINCENT DINICK ( PLASTIC AND RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGERY )
- BARRY FULLER ( OPHTHALMOLOGY - BLUE SKY VISION EYE CARE PC )
- LUIS GAGO ( OPHTHALMOLOGY - MID MICHIGAN EYE CARE CENTER PC )
- RYAN JONIK ( ANESTHESIOLOGY ASSISTANT - ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF ANN ARBOR PLLC )
- NICOLE LAROCCA ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - NORTHSTAR ANESTHESIA OF MICHIGAN III PLLC )
- NATHAN LEE ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF ANN ARBOR PLLC )
- LAUREEN MCGUIRE ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF ANN ARBOR PLLC )
- DONNA TAL ( OPHTHALMOLOGY )
- JAMOKAY TAYLOR ( GENERAL SURGERY - JAMOKAY TAYLOR PC )
- ELAINA VAYNTRUB ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - HOSPITAL CONSULTANTS PC )
- JACK WAGONER ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF ANN ARBOR PLLC )
- EDWARD WASHABAUGH ( INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT - MICHIGAN PAIN SPECIALISTS, PLLC )
- JOAN WESTBROOK ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - MICHIGAN PAIN SPECIALISTS, PLLC )
- SKYLER WOLFE ( OPHTHALMOLOGY - BLUE SKY VISION EYE CARE PC )
- JOSE YAP ( ANESTHESIOLOGY ASSISTANT - ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES OF ANN ARBOR PLLC )
