SKILLED NURSING OWNER & OPERATOR DATA
BROAD RIVER REHABILITATION
- Number of homes: 16
- Avg. Rating: 3.13:
- Deficiencies: 581
- Fines: $512,249
- States: 4
- Homes with Abuse Flag: 0
- Data date: May 01, 2026
BROAD RIVER REHABILITATION is involved with nursing homes in states: Michigan, North Carolina, Tennessee, and Wisconsin.
The distribution of the CMS 5-Star Overall Ratings for BROAD RIVER REHABILITATION:
| Number of Stars | Count |
|---|---|
| 5: | 4 |
| 4: | 1 |
| 3: | 7 |
| 2: | 1 |
| 1: | 3 |
For AI Users, Agents, and Developers
Do you use a Generative AI assistant like ChatGPT or Claude or others? If so, you can point your assistant to our MCP server at https://mcp.nursinghomedatabase.com/mcp and have it do the searching for you. Ask your question and use our data to help you find the answers.
- Prefer scripts? Use a public REST API for JSON over HTTPS. Or set up MCP using our setup guide.
- Fair use applies; high-volume or commercial use may need a custom data arrangement.
Nursing Homes Affiliated with BROAD RIVER REHABILITATION
Table below shows each skilled nursing home that BROAD RIVER REHABILITATION is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.
NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.
| Skilled Nursing Facility | Description |
|---|---|
|
Center On Aging and Health Role: operational/managerial control |
No. of Beds: 120 ERWIN, TN Ranking: #9 out of 26 (Ranking List) |
|
Cleveland Pines Role: operational/managerial control |
No. of Beds: 120 Shelby, NC Ranking: #22 out of 34 (Ranking List) |
|
Fairview Nursing and Rehabilitation Community Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 64 Centreville, MI Ranking: #13 out of 20 (Ranking List) |
|
Grayling Nursing and Rehabilitation Community Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 72 Grayling, MI Ranking: #2 out of 6 (Ranking List) |
|
Hillcrest Nursing and Rehabilitation Community Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 39 North Muskegon, MI Ranking: #3 out of 14 (Ranking List) |
|
Huntersville Oaks Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 168 Huntersville, NC Ranking: #34 out of 62 (Ranking List) |
|
Jesse Helms Nursing Center Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 70 Monroe, NC Ranking: #3 out of 35 (Ranking List) |
|
King Nursing and Rehabilitation Community Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 61 Houghton Lake, MI Ranking: #1 out of 6 (Ranking List) |
|
Mulder Health Care Facility Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 87 WEST SALEM, WI Ranking: #14 out of 14 (Ranking List) |
|
Marshall Nursing and Rehabilitation Community Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 60 Marshall, MI Ranking: #16 out of 17 (Ranking List) |
|
Rolling Hills Rehab Ctr Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 50 SPARTA, WI Ranking: #10 out of 15 (Ranking List) |
|
Riverside Nursing Centre Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 34 Grand Haven, MI Ranking: #27 out of 27 (Ranking List) |
|
Sardis Oaks Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 124 Charlotte, NC Ranking: #16 out of 59 (Ranking List) |
|
Stanly Manor Role: operational/managerial control |
No. of Beds: 90 Albemarle, NC Ranking: #17 out of 26 (Ranking List) |
|
The Timbers of Cass County Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 108 Dowagiac, MI Ranking: #25 out of 39 (Ranking List) |
|
Westgate Nursing and Rehabilitation Community Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 65 Ironwood, MI Ranking: #3 out of 4 (Ranking List) |
Skilled nursing homes with the red icon are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.
Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with BROAD RIVER REHABILITATION
Table below shows each skilled nursing home that BROAD RIVER REHABILITATION was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.
| Skilled Nursing Facility | Description |
|---|---|
|
Christian Care Center of Medina Most Recent Record: 12/01/2025 Role: limited partnership interest |
No. of Beds: 66 MEDINA, TN Ranking: #17 out of 19 (Ranking List) |
Skilled nursing homes with the red icon are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.
About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database
Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.
The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:
- 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
- DIRECTOR
- MANAGING EMPLOYEE
- OFFICER
- OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
- PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.