UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM Review
Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM to other hospitals
Overall Hospital Rating: ; HCAPS approval: 69%
Database data as of January 31, 2024
A Review of the Data
Prepared by Richard Saunders as of January 31, 2024.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, Survey Analysis.)
In the briefest summary, UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in WICHITA FALLS, TX. Its five star rating is 4 . Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 450010. It does provide emergency services. There are 368 medical professionals and 164 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, emergency patients were charged $28,391. This is higher than the state average of $27,898. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.
According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 69% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, while only 6% did not recommend going to UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Address:
1600 11TH STREET
WICHITA FALLS, TX
76301
(940) 764-3055
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
450010
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Voluntary non-profit - Private
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
---|---|
1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM to the national results for similar facilities.
Survey Question | Response |
---|---|
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 79 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 5 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 16 % |
Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 87 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 4 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 9 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 75 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 6 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 19 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 74 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 5 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 21 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 76 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 6 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 18 % |
Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 86 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 4 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 10 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 74 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 6 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 20 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 68 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 7 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 25 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 67 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 9 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 24 % |
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 67 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 8 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 25 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 68 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 9 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 23 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 60 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 22 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 18 % |
Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 74 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 12 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 14 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 47 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 32 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 21 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 14 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 86 % |
Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 17 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 83 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 11 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 89 % |
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 47 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 6 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 47 % |
Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 53 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 5 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 42 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 48 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 5 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 47 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 41 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 7 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 52 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 72 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 9 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 19 % |
Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 63 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 7 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 30 % |
Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 8 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 18 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 74 % |
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 6 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 69 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 25 % |
Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Cost of UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM: Not Available
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM:
Type | Amount |
---|---|
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $28 |
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $56 |
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $215 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $15 |
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $8 |
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $792 |
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $10,277 |
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $14 |
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $1,283 |
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $982 |
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $307 |
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $7,189 |
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $949 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $4,557 |
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $97 |
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,621 |
Total (Complete Episode) | $28,391 |
Infection Rates at UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
These measures show how often patients at UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.
Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
---|---|
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.32 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.65 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 7,610.00 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 7.55 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 6.00 / Same |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | 0.80 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.14 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.84 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 9,649.00 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 13.15 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 5.00 / Better |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | 0.38 / Better |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.21 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | 2.25 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 134.00 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 3.63 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 3.00 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery | 0.83 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.05 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | 4.79 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | 123.00 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | 1.03 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | 1.00 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | 0.97 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.01 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | 1.40 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 71,008.00 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 3.52 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 1.00 / Same |
MRSA Bacteremia | 0.28 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.55 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.04 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 68,211.00 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 48.44 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 37.00 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 0.76 / Same |
How UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Top Hospitals in WICHITA FALLS, TX
Worst Hospitals in WICHITA FALLS, TX
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
---|---|---|
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | 2.7% | SAME |
Death rate for heart attack patients | 13.6% | SAME |
Death rate for CABG surgery patients | 5.8% | Worse |
Death rate for COPD patients | 10% | SAME |
Death rate for heart failure patients | 13.6% | SAME |
Death rate for pneumonia patients | 19.7% | SAME |
Death rate for stroke patients | 13.3% | SAME |
Pressure ulcer rate | 1.04% | SAME |
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | 167.16% | SAME |
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.4% | SAME |
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.09% | SAME |
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 2.74% | SAME |
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.63% | SAME |
Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 5.48% | SAME |
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 2.33% | SAME |
Postoperative sepsis rate | 5.25% | SAME |
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 1.73% | SAME |
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 0.97% | SAME |
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 0.99% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Groups Affiliated with UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM
There are 368 doctors and 164 medical groups that are affiliated with UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.
Affiliated Doctor Groups
- FAMILY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES LLP
- LITTLE BLACK BAG HOUSE CALLS LLC
- UNITED REGIONAL PHYSICIAN GROUP
- TEXOMA REHAB PLLC
- LA MAGNA HEALTH PLLC
- TEXAS HEALTH PHYSICIANS GROUP
- LONESTAR HOSPITAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES PA
- QUANTUM EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS PA
- QUESTCARE HOSPITALISTS PLLC
- NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY SPECIALIST OF NORTH TEXAS PLLC
- SOUTHWEST MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, LLC
- ALL SKIN DERMATOLOGY, PLLC
- CLINICS OF NORTH TEXAS LLP
- BAYLOR COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- TEXOMA WOMENS CLINIC PA
- TALIS HEALTHCARE LLC
- TEXOMA RHEUMATOLOGY PLLC
- RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF WICHITA FALLS, P.A.
- DISCOVERY MEDICAL NETWORK HENRIETTA LLC
- WICHITA FALLS ANESTHESIA PLLC
- HEAD AND NECK SURGICAL ASSOCIATES
- CRITICAL CARE SPECIALISTS OF NORTH TEXAS PLLC
- ACUTE CARE SURGERY TEXOMA PLLC
- HOSPICE OF WICHITA FALLS, INC.
- MICAH BOYER MD
- PULMONARY SERVICES OF NORTH TEXAS PLLC
- ADAM S BUTERA MD PA
- HEALTHTEXAS PROVIDER NETWORK
- PALM DESERT RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- PROGRESSIVE PHYSICIAN ASSOC INC
- HALO MEDICAL GROUP
- STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA
- CHINATOWN TRUE CARE MEDICAL PLLC
- TEXAS ONCOLOGY PA
- ALLRAD PLLC
- USC CARE MEDICAL GROUP INC
- LOS ROBLES RADIOLOGIC ASSOCIATES
- COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
- MODESTO RADIOLOGICAL MEDICAL GROUP INC
- NRHS RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES
- CENTRE DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING PC
- RADIOLOGY PROFESSIONALS OF HUTCHINSON LLC
- SILICON VALLEY DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING INC
- COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
- ST JUDE RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- KENNEWICK RADIOLOGY GROUP PC
- X-RAY ASSOCIATES OF LOUISVILLE PSC
- GOLDING RADIOLOGY LTD
- WAIANAE DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL BOARD, INCORPORATED
- CONTEMPORARY DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING LLC
- AVAIL LC RADIOLOGY LLC
- INSIGHT CHICAGO INC
- CIGNA HEALTHCARE OF ARIZONA INC
- RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS OF LITTLE ROCK, PA
- ENDO SEDATION LLC
- U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA
- ELECTRA HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- AT HOME BY CHOICE INC
- MOTHER FRANCES HOSPITAL JACKSONVILLE
- CONCORD MEDICAL GROUP PLLC
- HOSPITALIST MEDICINE PHYSICIANS OF TEXAS PLLC
- UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM INC
- NOCONA MEDICAL CLINIC, P.A.
- NOCONA HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- TEXOMA UROLOGY CENTER
- NORTH CENTRAL TEXAS COMMUNITY HEALTH CARE CENTER INC
- ALPESH D. DESAI, D.O. P.A.
- AMERICAN ANESTHESIOLOGY OF VIRGINIA PC
- PIEDMONT ANESTHESIA LLC
- PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF NORTH TEXAS, P A
- COMANCHE COUNTY HOSPITAL AUTHORITY
- OBSERVATION SERVICES OF WICHITA FALLS LLC
- EMERGENCHEALTH PLLC
- NORTHSTAR ANESTHESIA PA
- WICHITA FALLS GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES
- WICHITA FALLS NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES, PLLC
- WISE EMERGENCY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES PA
- TITANIUM EMERGENCY GROUP LLP
- CONCORD MEDICAL GROUP OF TEXAS PLLC
- ORTHOPAEDIC ASSOCIATES LLP
- VARIETY CARE, INC.
- PUEBLO MEDICAL IMAGING, LLC
- SONORAN RADIOLOGY LTD
- ELLIS BANDT BIRKIN KOLLINS AND WONG PLLC
- FREEMAN-OAK HILL HEALTH SYSTEM
- MERCY HEALTH NORTHWEST ARKANSAS COMMUNITIES
- CHARLESTON AREA MEDICAL CENTER INC
- TITUS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- HUNT REGIONAL MEDICAL PARTNERS SPECIALISTS
- TSC SURGICAL GROUP PLLC
- MEDHEALTH
- JACK COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- COUNTY OF MONTEREY
- PLACERVILLE RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- MEDFORD RADIOLOGICAL GROUP PC
- TOWER IMAGING MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- INTEGRATED IMAGING CONSULTANTS LLC
- DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGISTS PC
- BARDEN THORWARTH DAUGHTRIDGE LTD
- BUTLER IMAGING AND INTERVENTIONAL ASSOCIATES LLC
- CENTRAL VALLEY IMAGING MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- RADIA CALIFORNIA RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS LTD
- RADIA INC P S
- REID PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
- RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES PA
- UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS
- ACCLAIM PHYSICIAN GROUP INC
- RENAISSANCE RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES PLLC
- HAWAII DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY SERVICES LLC
- ROCKFORD RADIOLOGY ASSOC
- GOLDEN STATE IMAGING ASSOCIATES INC
- FULLERTON RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- X-RAY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- FOCUS MEDICAL IMAGING
- SANTA CRUZ RADIOLOGY L L C
- I V RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP
- WILBARGER COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- THE DULUTH CLINIC LTD
- VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
- SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- ADVENTIST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER TEHACHAPI
- SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
- MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES HEALTHCARE DISTRICT
- PETERSON MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
- FOUNDATION RADIOLOGY GROUP PC
- TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER EL PASO
- MID COAST HEALTH SYSTEM
- CONCORD RADIOLOGY PLLC
- SHERIDAN RADIOLOGY SERVICES OF CENTRAL FLORIDA INC
- MORI BEAN AND BROOKS INC
- STANDARD ANESTHESIA, PLLC
- APOGEE MEDICAL GROUP TEXAS PA
- APOGEE MEDICAL GROUP, FLORIDA INC
- OLNEY-HAMILTON HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- CENTERWELL SENIOR PRIMARY CARE TX PA
- SOUND PHYSICIANS EMERGENCY MEDICINE OF ARIZONA INC
- THE PAIN REHABILITATION GROUP OF WICHITA FALLS PA
- CHE MILLER MD PLLC
- MEMORIAL MRI AND DIAGNOSTIC LLC
- MERCY HOSPITAL ARDMORE INC
- GRADY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- COMANCHE COUNTY HEALTHCARE CORPORATION
- HOSPITAL MEDICINE SERVICES OF TX, PC
- HOSPITAL PHYSICIAN SERVICES OF FLORIDA PA
- WICHITA HEART AND VASCULAR CENTER, PLLC
- SPORTS AND ORTHOPEDIC REHABILITATION SERVICES INC
- KENNEDY WHITE AND RIGGS ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES
- NORTH TEXAS SURGICAL SPECIALISTS PLLC
- OLIVER STREET 5.01(A) INC
- PINNACLE INTEGRATIVE ORTHOPEDICS AND SPORTS MEDICINE
- SANDIA NEUROLOGY GROUP PA
- SYNOVATION MEDICAL GROUP TEXAS, PLLC
- TEXAS PAIN RELIEF GROUP PLLC
- THE WEST TEXAS REHABILITATION CENTER
- ORTHOLONESTAR PLLC
- MONTCLAIR EMERGENCY MEDICAL ASSOCIATES
- SRIRAM AND SHONALATHA SUDARSHAN NORTH TEXAS CARDIOLOGY CENTER, LLP
- KELL WEST REGIONAL HOSPITAL LLC
- HILL REGIONAL PHYSICIAN GROUP INC
- CENTURY INTEGRATED PARTNERS, INC
- TOM S TALBERT MD PLLC
- YOUNGS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLC
- LAREDO ICU LLC
The list of medical professionals associated with UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with UNITED REGIONAL HEALTH CARE SYSTEM.