EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Review
Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL to other hospitals
Overall Hospital Rating: ; HCAPS approval: 60%
Database data as of January 31, 2024
A Review of the Data
Prepared by Richard Saunders as of January 31, 2024.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Survey Analysis.)
In the briefest summary, EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in COVINA, CA. Its five star rating is 2 . Its type of ownership is Proprietary. The facility's Medicare ID is 50382. It does provide emergency services. There are 361 medical professionals and 146 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $29,231. This is higher than the state average of $26,501. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.
According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 60% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, while only 8% did not recommend going to EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Address:
210 W SAN BERNARDINO ROAD
COVINA, CA
91723
(626) 814-2468
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
50382
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Proprietary
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
| Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
|---|---|
| 1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
| 2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
| 3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
| N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.
| Survey Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 73 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 20 % |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 80 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 6 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 14 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 70 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 22 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 68 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 9 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 23 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 72 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 20 % |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 79 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 5 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 16 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 69 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 9 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 22 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 67 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 23 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 53 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 30 % |
| Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 54 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 15 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 31 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 52 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 30 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 58 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 24 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 18 % |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 71 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 13 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 16 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 44 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 36 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 20 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 19 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 81 % |
| Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 23 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 77 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 16 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 84 % |
| Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 46 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 9 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 45 % |
| Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 52 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 11 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 37 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 47 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 8 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 45 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 39 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 7 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 54 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 63 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 12 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 25 % |
| Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 43 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 22 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 35 % |
| Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 12 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 26 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 62 % |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 8 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 60 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 32 % |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Cost of EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: Not Available
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL:
| Type | Amount |
|---|---|
| Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $26 |
| Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $51 |
| Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $85 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $53 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $15 |
| Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $622 |
| Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $10,173 |
| Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $15 |
| Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $1,626 |
| Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $893 |
| Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $90 |
| Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $6,413 |
| Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,010 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $5,941 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $75 |
| Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $2,143 |
| Total (Complete Episode) | $29,231 |
Infection Rates at EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
These measures show how often patients at EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.
| Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | -- / Better |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.22 / Better |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 13,266.00 / Better |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 13.81 / Better |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Better |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | 0.00 / Better |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.45 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.49 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 10,179.00 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 12.81 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 11.00 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | 0.86 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.02 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | 1.75 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 102.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 2.82 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 1.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery | 0.35 / Same |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | 89.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | 0.87 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.27 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | 2.01 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 92,417.00 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 4.79 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 4.00 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia | 0.84 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.40 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.91 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 83,533.00 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 37.16 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 23.00 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 0.62 / Better |
How EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
| Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | 3.1% | SAME |
| Death rate for heart attack patients | 15.1% | SAME |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients | 2.5% | SAME |
| Death rate for COPD patients | 9.1% | SAME |
| Death rate for heart failure patients | 15.1% | SAME |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients | 20.6% | SAME |
| Death rate for stroke patients | 13.3% | SAME |
| Pressure ulcer rate | 0.57% | SAME |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | 142.43% | SAME |
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.27% | SAME |
| In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.1% | SAME |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 2.14% | SAME |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.7% | SAME |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 11.22% | SAME |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 3.45% | SAME |
| Postoperative sepsis rate | 7.4% | SAME |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 2.32% | SAME |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 1.45% | SAME |
| CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 1.16% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Groups Affiliated with EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
There are 361 doctors and 146 medical groups that are affiliated with EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL.
Affiliated Doctor Groups
- EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP
- CALIFORNIA PULMONARY ASSOCIATES INC
- RIDGECREST REGIONAL HOSPITAL
- FOCUS MEDICAL IMAGING
- COLUMBUS RADIOLOGY CORP
- OHRI LLC
- ORLANDO HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP INC
- PREMIER FAMILY MEDICINE ASSOCIATES, INC
- SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA HOSPITALIST NETWORK MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SAN GABRIEL VALLEY CONSULTING PATHOLOGISTS MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SCOTT C LEDERHAUS MD AND LEW B DISNEY MD PRT LEDERHAUS SCOTT C GEN PTR
- REMEDIAL MEDICAL SERVICES INC
- MOUNTAIN COMMUNITIES HEALTHCARE DISTRICT
- APOLLOMED HOSPITALISTS A MEDICAL CORPORATION
- CEP AMERICA - CALIFORNIA
- CITY OF HOPE MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- STRENG BASSI BEGUM AND JIANG MEDICAL CORPORATION
- PHYSICIANS OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC
- CALIFORNIA KIDNEY SPECIALISTS
- ST VINCENT MEDICAL GROUP
- WILLIAM GILLESPIE AND ASSOCIATES INC
- FOOTHILL CARDIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- CITRUS VALLEY ANESTHESIA MEDICAL GROUP
- HEALTHCARE PARTNERS AFFILIATES MEDICAL GROUP
- EMANATE HEALTH MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION
- HASSAN CHAHINE MD INC
- INLAND ANESTHESIA PARTNERS, INC
- JYH C. CHANG MD, PROFESSIONAL CORP.
- STEVEN C LAU MD INC
- DOWNEY ANESTHESIA MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SAMY METYAS M.D. INC
- COVINA VALLEY UROLOGIC MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- CEP AMERICA - NEUROLOGY PC
- ARROWHEAD NEUROSURGICAL MEDICAL GROUP INC
- CALIFORNIA CARDIOVASCULAR CARE MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- CITRUS PATHOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP
- CUA AND GAN MEDICAL CORP
- UNITED MEDICAL DOCTORS
- S DHAND M D INC
- CHAPARRAL MEDICAL GROUP INC
- DON W LEE M D A MEDICAL CORPORATION
- RADHIKA TULPULE MD INC
- SAMIMI ORTHOPEDIC GROUP INC
- RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP OF WMMC
- VITAL HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP INC
- ALLRAD PLLC
- MODESTO RADIOLOGICAL MEDICAL GROUP INC
- INTEGRATED IMAGING CONSULTANTS LLC
- NRHS RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES
- DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGISTS PC
- X-RAY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SILICON VALLEY DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING INC
- SANTA CRUZ RADIOLOGY L L C
- ST JUDE RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS LTD
- KENNEWICK RADIOLOGY GROUP PC
- X-RAY ASSOCIATES OF LOUISVILLE PSC
- CONTEMPORARY DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING LLC
- GOLDING RADIOLOGY LTD
- COUNTY OF MONTEREY
- FULLERTON RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC
- REID PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES, INC.
- UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS
- RADIOLOGY CONSULTANTS OF LITTLE ROCK, PA
- INSIGHT CHICAGO INC
- LOS ROBLES RADIOLOGIC ASSOCIATES
- I V RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP
- ADVENTIST HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER TEHACHAPI
- SAN JOAQUIN COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
- COUNTY OF SAN JOAQUIN
- CONGRESS ASSOCIATES INC
- SUTTER BAY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- VERDANT MEDICINE, PC
- AV PHYSICIANS GROUP INC
- DARIN RENTZ DO PC
- ERIK PASIN MD INC
- ART VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL ASSOCIATES INC
- MULTISPECIALTY AND VASCULAR PARTNERS INC
- CVS MEDICAL GROUP INC
- HERRERA AND OBESO MEDICAL GROUP INC
- CENTRAL VALLEY IMAGING MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
- SUTTER VALLEY MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- STEWART AND STEWART A MEDICAL CORPORATION
- LONG LIFE CARDIAC CENTER MEDICAL CORPORATION
- USC CARE MEDICAL GROUP INC
- BEAVER MEDICAL GROUP PC
- OPTIMUM WOUND CARE INC
- CARDIO-VASCULAR ASSOCIATES , INC.
- BANDB MEDICAL GROUP INC
- SAMARITAN ANESTHESIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP
- INLAND PSYCHIATRIC MEDICAL GROUP INC
- ALLIED ANESTHESIA MEDICAL GROUP INC
- ORANGE COAST ANESTHESIA INC
- CEP AMERICA - ANESTHESIA PC
- MEDVANTAGE ANESTHESIA CARE INC
- GOLDENCAST MEDICAL CORPORATION
- CARECONNECTMD CA PC
- HOUSECALL MD,INC
- HOSPITAL MEDICINE OF CALIFORNIA INC
- MENALAM HEALTH SERVICES PC
- PIER ANESTHESIA GROUP INC
- WAIANAE DISTRICT COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH AND HOSPITAL BOARD, INCORPORATED
- AVAIL LC RADIOLOGY LLC
- NEUROVASCULAR AND SPINE ASSOCIATES, A MEDICAL CORPORATION
- LAKE FOREST MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- PALM DESERT RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- POMONA VALLEY IMAGING MEDICAL GROUP INC
- AVALON MEDICAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
- ARROYO VISTA FAMILY HEALTH FOUNDATION
- NILESH N PATEL MD INC
- PLACERVILLE RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- RENAISSANCE RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES PLLC
- ROCKFORD RADIOLOGY ASSOC
- BARDEN THORWARTH DAUGHTRIDGE LTD
- BUTLER IMAGING AND INTERVENTIONAL ASSOCIATES LLC
- GRANDVIEW MEDICAL GROUP INC
- MAY MEDICAL MANAGEMENT CORPORATION
- FOOTHILLS PAIN MANAGEMENT CLINIC PC
- MIDWEST ANESTHESIA PROVIDERS SC
- KRISHNA J MOHAN MD INC
- EAST VALLEY COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER, INC.
- ANTHONY S. OH, M.D, A MEDICAL CORPORATON
- INDUS HEALTHCARE, INC.
- MEMORIALCARE MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE SPECIALISTS A MEDICAL GROUP INC
- ABRI MD GROUP INC
- MEDICAL IMAGING OF LEHIGH VALLEY PC
- BASHAR G SAAD MD INC
- GOLDEN STATE IMAGING ASSOCIATES INC
- RENAISSANCE IMAGING MEDICAL ASSOCIATES INC
- HP ANESTHESIA INC
- RAMTIN MASSOUDI MD INC
- GOLDEN STATE MEDICAL GROUP
- CARBON HEALTH MEDICAL GROUP OF CALIFORNIA PC
- LANDMARK ANESTHESIA MEDICAL GROUP
- MAYFLOWER MEDICAL GROUP INC
- BEDFORD BREAST CENTER, INC
- PROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- HOSPITALIST GROUP OF MONTEBELLO INC
- VU D TRAN MD INC
- GASTRO CARE INSTITUTE
- VP ANESTHESIA PARTNERS INC
- SHAPIRO STAFFORD YEE AND POLONSKY PC
- CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CARE FOUNDATION
- MINK RADIOLOGIC IMAGING MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC.
The list of medical professionals associated with EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with EMANATE HEALTH INTER-COMMUNITY HOSPITAL.
