LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL in LOS ANGELES, CA:
Reviews, Ratings, Surveys, Comparisons, Find a Doctor, etc.
Overall Rating:
Database data was released on January 25, 2023
About LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Rating:
NursingHomeDatabase has the latest reviews, location, phone numbers, list of medical professionaals and other information about LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL.
LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL is one of a type of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is located in LOS ANGELES, CA. Its five star rating is 4. It's type of ownership is Proprietary. The facility's Medicare ID is 50663.
EMERGENCY SERVICES: It does provide emergency services.
There are 116 medical professionals affiliated with LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL.
According to a survey by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, only 35% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, while 27% did not recommend going to LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Address:
4081 E OLYMPIC BLVD
LOS ANGELES, CA
90023
(323) 267-0477
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
50663
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Proprietary
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
The methodology used to calculate Overall Star Ratings involves multiple steps to select, standardize, and calculate scores based on Care Compare measures. Overall Star Ratings are created using this seven-step process:
- Selection and standardization of measures for inclusion in the Overall Star Rating
- Assignment of measures to groups
- Calculation and standardization of measure group scores
- Calculation of hospital summary scores as a weighted average of available group scores
- Application of minimum thresholds for receiving an Overall Star Rating
- Assignment of hospitals to peer groups based on their number of measure groups (3, 4, or 5)
- Application of clustering algorithm to categorize summary scores into star ratings
For each hospital, a hospital summary score is calculated by taking the weighted average of the hospital’s scores for each measure group. The table below shows the weight applied to each measure group. The hospital summary score is then used to assign hospitals to star ratings, using k-means clustering within each peer group.
| Measure group | Weight used in calculation |
|---|---|
| Mortality | 22% |
| Safety | 22% |
| Readmission | 22% |
| Patient Experience | 22% |
| Timely & Effective Care | 12% |
Note that these percentage weights are out of 100%. If a hospital has no measures in a certain measure group, the weighted percentage is redistributed proportionally to the other measure groups. For example, if a hospital had no measures in the Timely & Effective Care category, the 12% weight would be redistributed evenly as 25% for each of the Mortality, Safety of Care, Readmission and Patient Experience groups.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
| Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
|---|---|
| 1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
| 2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
| 3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
| N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Cost of LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: 126.92%
On average at LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL, emergency patients were changed $33,455. This is higher than the state average of $25,229. It is also higher than the state average of $24,355.
More Information about the calculation of Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary for LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: The measure assesses Medicare Part A and Part B payments for services provided to a LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL during a spending-per-beneficiary episode that spans from three days prior to an inpatient hospital admission through 30 days after discharge. The payments included in this measure are price-standardized and risk-adjusted. The payment measures for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement are estimates of payments associated with a 30-day episode of care for heart attack, heart failure, or pneumonia, or a 90-day episode of care for hip/knee replacement. The episode of care begins with the admission. For the heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia measures, payments across multiple care settings, services, and supplies (inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, home health, hospice, physician/clinical laboratory/ambulance services, durable medical equipment, prosthetics/orthotics, and supplies) are assessed for the next 30 days. For hip/knee replacement, the measure includes all payments for the next 30 days but also includes payments related to the hip/knee replacement for days 31 – 90. For the heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement payment measures, payment rates are provided in the downloadable database and presented on the Hospital Care Compare website in terms of dollars. Hospitals’ rates are compared to the national mean payment to categorize whether a hospital’s payment rate is less than the national mean payment, no different than the national mean payment, or greater than the national mean payment, For some hospitals, the number of cases is too small to reliably compare their results to the national mean payment. The payment measures are not intended to be interpreted in isolation but to be considered in the context of existing quality measures such as CMS’s 30-day mortality measures for heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia, and the 90-day complication measure for hip/knee replacement.
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL:
| Type | Amount |
|---|---|
| Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $9 |
| Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $1 |
| Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $10 |
| Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $101 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $41 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $3 |
| Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $813 |
| Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $9,510 |
| Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $1,371 |
| Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $204 |
| Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $101 |
| Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $3,344 |
| Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $690 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $15,342 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $39 |
| Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,878 |
| Total (Complete Episode) | $33,455 |
Infection Rates at LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
These measures show how often patients at LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally. HAI measures provide information on infections that occur while the patient is in the hospital and include: central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), catheterassociated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), surgical site infection (SSI) from colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) blood laboratory-identified events (bloodstream infections), and Clostridium difficile (C.diff.) laboratory-identified events (intestinal infections). The HAI measures show how often patients at LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to like hospitals. The CDC calculates a Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) which may take into account the type of patient care location, number of patients with an existing infection, laboratory methods, hospital affiliation with a medical school, bed size of the hospital, patient age, and classification of patient health. SIRs are calculated for the hospital, the state, and the nation. Hospitals’ SIRs are compared to the national benchmark to determine if hospitals’ performance on these measures is better than the national benchmark (lower), no different than the national benchmark, or worse than the national benchmark (higher). The HAI measures apply to all patients treated in acute care hospitals, including adult, pediatric, neonatal, Medicare, and non-Medicare patients.
| Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | -- / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 2.01 / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 2,325.00 / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 1.49 / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | 0.00 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | -- / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.36 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 3,796.00 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 2.20 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | 0.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 5.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 0.14 / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | 3.30 / Worse |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | 12.40 / Worse |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 38,102.00 / Worse |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 1.33 / Worse |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 9.00 / Worse |
| MRSA Bacteremia | 6.76 / Worse |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.00 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.44 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 38,102.00 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 11.33 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 1.00 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 0.09 / Better |
How LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Top Hospitals in LOS ANGELES, CA
Worst Hospitals in LOS ANGELES, CA
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
| Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for heart attack patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for COPD patients | 7.2% | SAME |
| Death rate for heart failure patients | 8.4% | SAME |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients | 7.8% | Better |
| Death rate for stroke patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Pressure ulcer rate | 0.03% | SAME |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.17% | SAME |
| In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.06% | SAME |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 2.24% | SAME |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 2.81% | SAME |
| Postoperative sepsis rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 0.79% | SAME |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 0.97% | SAME |
| CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 0.83% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Professsionals Affiliated with LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
These are the doctors affliated with this hospital:
- MOHAMAD ABDELFATTAH ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - MARTIN LUTHER KING JR COMMUNITY MEDICAL GROUP )
- SEYED MAHDI ABTAHI ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - FOCUS MEDICAL IMAGING )
- MOUSTAFA ALAMY ( GASTROENTEROLOGY - LOS ANGELES CLINICA MEDICA GENERAL MEDICAL CENTER, INC. )
- SAMI ALI ( HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY - THE ONCOLOGY INSTITUTE CA, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION )
- JARON ANDERSEN ( ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY - RICHARD LIN DO INC )
- IKECHUKWU ARENE ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- NAGASAMUDRA ASHOK ( FAMILY PRACTICE - DOCTORS MANAGED EMERGENCY MEDICAL GROUP INC. )
- LEE AU ( FAMILY PRACTICE - VOHRA WOUND PHYSICIANS OF CA, P.C. )
- RAYMOND AZAB ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - FOCUS MEDICAL IMAGING )
- DAVID BAGTAS ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - ARINDER CHADHA MD INC )
- JAGAN BANSAL ( PULMONARY DISEASE )
- SHAMIK BHADRA ( NEPHROLOGY - L A COUNTY NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- GURTEJBIR BILKHU ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CALIFORNIA HOSPITALISTS EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- MAHUA BISWAS ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - FIRST MEDICAL CENTER INC )
- EDGARDO CAPITULO ( GENERAL PRACTICE )
- TROY CASHATT ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- ARINDER CHADHA ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - ARINDER CHADHA MD INC )
- ARATI CHAND ( HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY - THE ONCOLOGY INSTITUTE CA, A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION )
- KRISTOFFER CHIN ( FAMILY PRACTICE - EXCELL INTEGRATED MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- OLIVER CHIU ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - DOCTORS MANAGED EMERGENCY MEDICAL GROUP INC. )
- PRADIP CHOWDHURY ( NEPHROLOGY - L A COUNTY NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- CHRISTOPHER CHU ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) - CHRISTOPHER W CHU MD INC )
- ADOLPHUS COLE ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- HEENA CONTRACTOR ( NEPHROLOGY - MEDICINE AND NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES )
- ALFRED COOK ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- REZA DEHDARI ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - FOCUS MEDICAL IMAGING )
- RAHUL DHAWAN ( NEPHROLOGY - VIJAY M DHAWAN MD INC )
- MARCEL FILART ( GERIATRIC MEDICINE - CAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- JOHN FOSBINDER ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- JAMES FRENCHER ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - KERN RADIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- HIRUY GESSESSE ( PSYCHIATRY - ADDIS MEDICAL GROUP A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- MICHAEL GHODS ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS HOME CARE INC )
- ROBERT GIBBS ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - ER PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- CARLOS GONZALEZ ( NEPHROLOGY - L A COUNTY NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- TIJANI HASSAN ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - MINK RADIOLOGIC IMAGING MEDICAL ASSOCIATES, INC. )
- GLENN HIFUMI ( GENERAL SURGERY )
- JILL HITSELBERGER ( CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGIST - OCEANSIDE MEDICAL GROUP, A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- DONALD HOECHLIN ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - CAN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- ANDY HONG ( NEPHROLOGY )
- SYED HOSSAIN ( INTERNAL MEDICINE )
- JIMMY HUANG ( FAMILY PRACTICE - JIMMY C. HUANG, DO, A PROFESSIONAL CORP )
- CHIN-WEI HUANG ( PULMONARY DISEASE - OC PULMONARY AND SLEEP, INC )
- JAMES JABER ( OTOLARYNGOLOGY )
- RICK JENKINS ( PSYCHIATRY - VORTEX MENTAL HEALTH )
- RAMON JOCOM ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - ARINDER CHADHA MD INC )
- GADSON JOHNSON ( PSYCHIATRY - OCEANSIDE MEDICAL GROUP, A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- MARCO JUAREZ ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - VIP NEPHROLOGY INC )
- EVELYN KACHIKWU ( GENERAL SURGERY - PIH HEALTH PHYSICIANS )
- GEORGE KARROUM ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - ER PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- DAVID KAY ( FAMILY PRACTICE - WEST COAST WOUND AND SKIN CARE INC )
- PHONG KIEU ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - OCEANSIDE MEDICAL GROUP, A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- CHAN KIM ( NEUROLOGY )
- DAVID KRAMER ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) )
- KAY KYAW ( NEPHROLOGY - L A COUNTY NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- NILZA LAL ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - ARINDER CHADHA MD INC )
- BRIAN LEE ( NEPHROLOGY )
- SAERY LIM ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - CHRISTOPHER W CHU MD INC )
- RICHARD LIN ( ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY - RICHARD LIN DO INC )
- STEPHANIE LIN ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - FOCUS MEDICAL IMAGING )
- ARNOLD LING ( FAMILY PRACTICE )
- DEBORAH LINTON ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - ARINDER CHADHA MD INC )
- ANTONIO LIU ( NEUROLOGY - NUVIEW HEALTH INDIANA PC )
- ALAN MARKIE ( PSYCHIATRY - ASC TREATMENT GROUP )
- KAMRAN MATIN ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) )
- NASER MEHRIZI ( GENERAL SURGERY )
- ELDER MENDOZA ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - L A COUNTY NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- AJMAL MOHAMMAD ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MOIEZ KHANKHANIAN, M.D. INC )
- HENRICO MUNGCAL ( GENERAL PRACTICE )
- HARRIS MUSAFER ( PULMONARY DISEASE )
- DESIRAE MUTUC-RESARI ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - DERDERYAN MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- ALBERT NASSIR ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - CENTURY WOMEN MEDICAL GROUP, INC. )
- MICHAEL NGUYEN ( ANESTHESIOLOGY )
- HUNG NGUYEN ( FAMILY PRACTICE )
- MICHAEL NOEL ( ANESTHESIOLOGY )
- KINGSLEY OFOEGBU ( INTERNAL MEDICINE )
- OSAMAMWODE OGBEIWI ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - OCEANSIDE MEDICAL GROUP, A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- WESLEY OH ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - FOCUS MEDICAL IMAGING )
- ADAOBI OZOH ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - HOWARD L ASKINS A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- MARIO PACHECO ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - OCEANSIDE MEDICAL GROUP, A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- ELISA PARK ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - L A COUNTY NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- PRODE PASCUAL ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - PRODE P PASCUAL MD INC )
- DEVESH PATEL ( INFECTIOUS DISEASE )
- JESSICA ERENE PAZ ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - OCEANSIDE MEDICAL GROUP, A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- MARISOL PENICHET ( PATHOLOGY - MEMORIAL PATHOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- VIMAL PONNEZHAN ( PULMONARY DISEASE - FOOTHILL PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE CONSULTANTS MEDICAL GROUP INC. )
- WILLIAM POWER ( PATHOLOGY - GLENVIEW PATHOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- LATHIKA RAAKESH ( NEPHROLOGY - L A COUNTY NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- MASOUD RAHBAN ( INFECTIOUS DISEASE )
- MARTINA RANDALL ( PODIATRY - MRR FOOT AND ANKLE INC )
- BRUCE REITMAN ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - ANESTHESIA SPECIALISTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, INC. )
- FRIEDRICH ROESSLER ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - ST VINCENT ANESTHESIA MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- ROBERT RUELAZ ( CARDIAC ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY - CHRISTUS TRINITY CLINIC )
- MANUEL SACAPANO ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE )
- MARK SAMONTE ( GENERAL PRACTICE - MOBILE PHYSICIANS MEDICAL ALLIED GROUP INC )
- MANOHAR SENRA ( CRITICAL CARE (INTENSIVISTS) )
- JIM SERAJ ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - SOUND PHYSICIANS EMERGENCY MEDICINE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PC )
- EYAL SHTORCH ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - VIP NEPHROLOGY INC )
- AMRIT SINGH ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) )
- DOUGLAS SLABAUGH ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CALIFORNIA HOSPITALISTS EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- ROBERT ST THOMAS ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - ANESTHESIA SPECIALISTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, INC. )
- MAYBEL TAN ( NEPHROLOGY - L A COUNTY NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- DAVID TAO ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - COAST PLAZA EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS GROUP INC )
- JONATHAN TAVAKOLI ( PODIATRY - OMEGA PODIATRY INC )
- MICHAEL TOLWIN ( PSYCHIATRY - TOLWIN PSYCHIATRIC MEDICAL GROUP INC )
- GUSTAVO TORRES-CIFUENTES ( VASCULAR SURGERY )
- EDGAR TOSCANO ( NEPHROLOGY )
- TU TRAN ( GASTROENTEROLOGY - MOUSTAFA E ALAMY MD INC )
- VERONICA VIRAMONTES ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - L A COUNTY NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES A MEDICAL CORPORATION )
- DUSHYANT VISWANATHAN ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - YACOUB MEDICAL, INC. )
- SHUO WANG ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - GLOBAL PHYSICIANS RESOURCES INC )
- ASSA WEINBERG ( RHEUMATOLOGY )
- ALEXIS WONG ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - FOCUS MEDICAL IMAGING )
- JAMES WU ( THORACIC SURGERY )
- ATEF YACOUB ( GENERAL PRACTICE - YACOUB MEDICAL, INC. )
- RICHARD YOO ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - FOCUS MEDICAL IMAGING )
- MARTIN ZAPATA ( INTERNAL MEDICINE )
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.
| Survey Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 58 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 19 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 23 % |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 65 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 53 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 19 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 28 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 56 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 22 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 22 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 62 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 19 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 19 % |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 71 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 16 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 13 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 60 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 19 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 21 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 56 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 21 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 23 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 41 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 34 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 25 % |
| Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 38 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 39 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 23 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 44 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 28 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 28 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 40 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 39 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 21 % |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 52 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 24 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 24 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 28 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 54 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 31 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 69 % |
| Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 36 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 64 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 25 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 75 % |
| Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 54 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 17 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 29 % |
| Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 53 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 25 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 22 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 56 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 14 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 30 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 53 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 13 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 34 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 60 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 14 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 26 % |
| Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 35 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 36 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 29 % |
| Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 25 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 32 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 43 % |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 27 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 35 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 38 % |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
