TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION in TUBA CITY, AZ:
Reviews, Ratings, Surveys, Comparisons, Find a Doctor, etc.

Overall Rating:

Database data was released on January 25, 2023

About TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION

Rating:

NursingHomeDatabase has the latest reviews, location, phone numbers, list of medical professionaals and other information about TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION.

TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION is one of a type of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is located in TUBA CITY, AZ. Its five star rating is 2. It's type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Other. The facility's Medicare ID is 30073.

EMERGENCY SERVICES: It DOES NOT provide emergency services.

There are 120 medical professionals affiliated with TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION.

According to a survey by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 58% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, while only 9% did not recommend going to TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION.

The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.

General Information for TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION

Address:

PO BOX 600
TUBA CITY, AZ 86045
(928) 283-2501
Click for Map

Medicare Provider Number:

30073

Type:

Acute Care Hospitals

Ownership:

Voluntary non-profit - Other

Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION

Overall Rating:

The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.

Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.

The methodology used to calculate Overall Star Ratings involves multiple steps to select, standardize, and calculate scores based on Care Compare measures. Overall Star Ratings are created using this seven-step process:

  1. Selection and standardization of measures for inclusion in the Overall Star Rating
  2. Assignment of measures to groups
  3. Calculation and standardization of measure group scores
  4. Calculation of hospital summary scores as a weighted average of available group scores
  5. Application of minimum thresholds for receiving an Overall Star Rating
  6. Assignment of hospitals to peer groups based on their number of measure groups (3, 4, or 5)
  7. Application of clustering algorithm to categorize summary scores into star ratings

For each hospital, a hospital summary score is calculated by taking the weighted average of the hospital’s scores for each measure group. The table below shows the weight applied to each measure group. The hospital summary score is then used to assign hospitals to star ratings, using k-means clustering within each peer group.

Measure group Weight used in calculation
Mortality 22%
Safety 22%
Readmission 22%
Patient Experience 22%
Timely & Effective Care 12%

Note that these percentage weights are out of 100%. If a hospital has no measures in a certain measure group, the weighted percentage is redistributed proportionally to the other measure groups. For example, if a hospital had no measures in the Timely & Effective Care category, the 12% weight would be redistributed evenly as 25% for each of the Mortality, Safety of Care, Readmission and Patient Experience groups.

National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.

Overall rating Number of hospitals / Percentage
1 star 198 (6.34%)
2 stars 702 (22.49%)
3 stars 895 (28.68%)
4 stars 895 (28.68%)
5 stars 431 (13.81%)
N/A 1,368 (30.47%)

Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.

Cost of TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: 86.23%

On average at TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION, emergency patients were changed $18,331. This is lower than the state average of $24,406. It is also lower than the state average of $24,355.

More Information about the calculation of Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary for TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION: The measure assesses Medicare Part A and Part B payments for services provided to a TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION during a spending-per-beneficiary episode that spans from three days prior to an inpatient hospital admission through 30 days after discharge. The payments included in this measure are price-standardized and risk-adjusted. The payment measures for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement are estimates of payments associated with a 30-day episode of care for heart attack, heart failure, or pneumonia, or a 90-day episode of care for hip/knee replacement. The episode of care begins with the admission. For the heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia measures, payments across multiple care settings, services, and supplies (inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, home health, hospice, physician/clinical laboratory/ambulance services, durable medical equipment, prosthetics/orthotics, and supplies) are assessed for the next 30 days. For hip/knee replacement, the measure includes all payments for the next 30 days but also includes payments related to the hip/knee replacement for days 31 – 90. For the heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement payment measures, payment rates are provided in the downloadable database and presented on the Hospital Care Compare website in terms of dollars. Hospitals’ rates are compared to the national mean payment to categorize whether a hospital’s payment rate is less than the national mean payment, no different than the national mean payment, or greater than the national mean payment, For some hospitals, the number of cases is too small to reliably compare their results to the national mean payment. The payment measures are not intended to be interpreted in isolation but to be considered in the context of existing quality measures such as CMS’s 30-day mortality measures for heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia, and the 90-day complication measure for hip/knee replacement.

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $16
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $288
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $3
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $858
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $9,217
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $17
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $685
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $284
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $155
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $2,402
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $1,065
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $2,424
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $38
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $878
Total (Complete Episode) $18,331

Infection Rates at TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION

These measures show how often patients at TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally. HAI measures provide information on infections that occur while the patient is in the hospital and include: central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), catheterassociated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), surgical site infection (SSI) from colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) blood laboratory-identified events (bloodstream infections), and Clostridium difficile (C.diff.) laboratory-identified events (intestinal infections). The HAI measures show how often patients at TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to like hospitals. The CDC calculates a Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) which may take into account the type of patient care location, number of patients with an existing infection, laboratory methods, hospital affiliation with a medical school, bed size of the hospital, patient age, and classification of patient health. SIRs are calculated for the hospital, the state, and the nation. Hospitals’ SIRs are compared to the national benchmark to determine if hospitals’ performance on these measures is better than the national benchmark (lower), no different than the national benchmark, or worse than the national benchmark (higher). The HAI measures apply to all patients treated in acute care hospitals, including adult, pediatric, neonatal, Medicare, and non-Medicare patients.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 438.00 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.34 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 660.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.49 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 1.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 5.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 0.12 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 1.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 0.01 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 7,383.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 0.25 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 2.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit 0.96 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 4.91 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 7,383.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 2.54 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 6.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 2.36 / Same

How TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in TUBA CITY, AZ

Worst Hospitals in TUBA CITY, AZ

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients 2.7% SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for CABG surgery patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart failure patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for pneumonia patients 16.2% SAME
Death rate for stroke patients NA Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate 0.22% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications NA Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.18% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.07% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.56% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 0.89% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 5.33% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 3.13% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 3.95% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate 0.78% SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 0.99% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.92% SAME

Skilled Nursing Facilities Near TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION

Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.

Facility Name Overall Rating

Medical Professsionals Affiliated with TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION

These are the doctors affliated with this hospital:

  • DANIEL ADENEYE ( NEPHROLOGY - DHHS PHS NAIHS CHINLE COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE FACILITY )
  • SPENCER ANDERSON ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • SUSAN ANDREW ( ALLERGY/IMMUNOLOGY - SINUS AND ALLERGY SPECIALISTS OF TEXAS PLLC )
  • AUDREY ANDZELIK ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • ANDREW ATIEMO ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) - NORTHERN ARIZONA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION )
  • WILLIAM BADGER ( UROLOGY - FLAGSTAFF SURGICAL ASSOCIATES PA )
  • MICHAEL BAGLEY ( ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JOSEPH BARDIN ( PODIATRY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • KIMBERLY BECKER ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • MARK BEVAN ( NEPHROLOGY - FOUR CORNERS NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES PC )
  • LUZ MARINA BRADBERRY ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • LAUREN BREIHAN ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • INGA BROWN ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • DOMINIQUE BROWNE ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • PAUL BURGI ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • SOPHINA CALDERON ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • SYLVIA CARDOUNELL ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • TERESA CAYA ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • SCOTT CHANG ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - SOUTHEAST ALASKA REGIONAL HEALTH CONSORTIUM )
  • JOACHIM CHINO ( GENERAL SURGERY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • GEOFFREY COOK ( ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • CHRISTINE CROWDER ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • KIMBERLY CUNNINGHAM ( OPTOMETRY - DHEW IND HLTH SV HLTH SVS AND MNTL HLTH ADM )
  • MATTHEW DAAB ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • FRANK DALICHOW ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JEFFREY DANIEL ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • NAKYDA DEAN ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • TIMOTHY DECAPITE ( DERMATOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JOHANNA DIMENTO ( HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JOHN DURHAM ( ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • RACHELLE EDDIE ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • MADELINE EELLS ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • LUISA ELIZALDE ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • KENNETH EPSTEIN ( RHEUMATOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • BENJAMIN EVERETT ( PSYCHIATRY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • KATHERINE FERGUSON ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • BREANNE FLORES ( OPTOMETRY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • BRYAN FOLEY ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - NORTHERN ARIZONA RADIOLOGY PC )
  • BENJAMIN GANDESBERY ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • LUIS GARCIA ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • LACEY GIBSON ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • KATHERINE GLASER ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • ADAM GOUGH ( PODIATRY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • THOMAS GROSHEIDER ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • KATHLEEN HARNER ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • WADE HARRIS ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • REGINA HART ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JEFFREY HARVEY ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - EMERGENCY MEDICINE SPECIALISTS SC )
  • PHILIP HO ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - NORTHERN ARIZONA RADIOLOGY PC )
  • NELDA HUSKIE ( CLINICAL SOCIAL WORKER - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • LORAN JACOBS ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • GREGORY JARRIN ( GENERAL SURGERY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • LEE JOHNSON ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • NATASHA JOHNSON ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • AMANDA JONES ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • TRAVIS JONES ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • KAREN JONG ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JUSTIN KAN ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - EMERGENCY PROFESSIONALS OF COLORADO PC )
  • HANNA KANG ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • RALPH KELLEY ( GENERAL SURGERY - FLAGSTAFF SURGICAL ASSOCIATES PA )
  • PETER KIM ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • TODD KRUSE ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • FAIZA LALEKA ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - BANNER HOSPITAL BASED PHYSICIANS ARIZONA LLC )
  • ELIZABETH LALLY ( INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • DAVID LANG ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • SEAN LARSEN ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - NORTHERN ARIZONA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION )
  • DAVID LEDER ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) - NORTHERN ARIZONA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION )
  • AKIL LOLI ( INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY - LEGACY HEART CARE OF PHOENIX, LLC )
  • BERNICE LY ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • MICHAEL LYNCH ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • KATHRYN MAGEE ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JOSEPH MAGEE ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JULIE MALONEY ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JARRED MCATEER ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • PATRICIA MCCULLOUGH ( OPTOMETRY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • REBECCA MILLER ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • RICHARD MITCHELL ( OPTOMETRY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • DHRITI MUKHOPADHYAY ( GENERAL SURGERY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • MATTHEW NELSON ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • NANCY NICHOLS ( OPTOMETRY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • BRADLEY NICOL ( NEUROSURGERY )
  • ERIKA OLSON ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • RONDA OLSON ( OPTOMETRY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • ERIKA PAGE ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • MANISH PANDYA ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - DHHS PHS NAIHS CHINLE COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE FACILITY )
  • MICHAEL PAPEZ ( PATHOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • CANDACE PATEL ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • TRUNG PHAM ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • LAWRENCE RICHARDSON ( OPTOMETRY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • ROBERT RIETHER ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JOSEPH ROBINSON ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CENTRAL COAST EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS )
  • MITCHELL ROSS ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • ZENA SALIM ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • CARL SCHOFIELD ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - TON SAN XAVIER HEALTH CENTER )
  • KATRINA SEXAUER ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • CHRISTOPHER SHARPE ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - ATLANTICARE PHYSICIAN GROUP PA )
  • MARY SILCOX ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JULIE SKAGGS ( OPHTHALMOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • ALEJANDRO SOLANO BAYARDO ( NEPHROLOGY - DHHS PHS NAIHS CHINLE COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE FACILITY )
  • NICOLAS STADLBERGER ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • TESSA STAMILE ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • MYLES STONE ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • HA TANG ( FAMILY PRACTICE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • TERRIS THOMPSON ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • VALERIE THOROYAN ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • ANDRES TORRES ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • FLORINDA TRACEY ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • HENRY VAN DYK ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • DURAND WAGNER ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • CORRINE WALKER ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • OMAR WANI ( INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY - NORTHERN ARIZONA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION )
  • STEPHEN WARD ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - NORTHERN ARIZONA RADIOLOGY PC )
  • ALEXANDER WATSON ( HOSPITALIST - NORTHERN ARIZONA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION )
  • TERRY WERNER ( OTOLARYNGOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • PATRICK WHEELER ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • ANGELA WHITE ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • JENNIFER WHITEHAIR ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )
  • WEI WONG ( NEPHROLOGY - DHHS PHS NAIHS CHINLE COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CARE FACILITY )
  • ROGER YOUNG ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - 24 ON PHYSICIANS PC )
  • KOSTA ZINIS ( ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY - TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION )

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for TUBA CITY REGIONAL HEALTH CARE CORPORATION to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 72 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 11 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 17 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 79 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 8 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 13 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 68 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 11 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 21 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 69 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 12 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 19 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 75 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 8 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 17 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 82 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 8 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 69 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 21 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 73 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 20 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 67 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 15 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 18 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 65 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 16 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 19 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 67 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 14 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 19 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 62 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 15 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 23 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 74 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 4 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 22 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 50 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 26 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 24 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 16 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 84 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 20 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 80 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 13 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 87 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 54 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 9 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 37 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 56 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 14 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 30 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 56 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 37 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 51 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 7 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 42 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 68 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 11 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 21 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 51 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 21 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 28 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 16 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 24 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 60 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 9 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 58 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 33 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable