SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL Review
Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL to other hospitals
Overall Hospital Rating: ; HCAPS approval: 68%
Database data as of January 31, 2024
A Review of the Data
Prepared by Richard Saunders as of January 31, 2024.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL, Survey Analysis.)
In the briefest summary, SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in FAYETTEVILLE, AR. Its five star rating is 4 . Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Other. The facility's Medicare ID is 40001. It does provide emergency services. There are 130 medical professionals and 47 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL, emergency patients were charged $26,502. This is higher than the state average of $25,829. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.
According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 68% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL, while only 8% did not recommend going to SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Address:
3873 N PARKVIEW DRIVE
FAYETTEVILLE, AR
72703
(479) 524-4141
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
40001
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Voluntary non-profit - Other
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
| Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
|---|---|
| 1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
| 2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
| 3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
| N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.
| Survey Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 78 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 6 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 16 % |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 85 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 4 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 11 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 75 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 73 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 20 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 76 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 17 % |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 81 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 4 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 15 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 74 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 72 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 66 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 9 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 25 % |
| Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 65 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 27 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 68 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 22 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 59 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 23 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 18 % |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 71 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 12 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 48 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 34 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 15 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 85 % |
| Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 19 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 81 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 12 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 88 % |
| Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 43 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 8 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 49 % |
| Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 50 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 8 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 42 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 43 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 9 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 48 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 37 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 6 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 57 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 74 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 5 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 21 % |
| Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 70 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 5 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 25 % |
| Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 11 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 18 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 71 % |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 8 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 68 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 24 % |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Cost of SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL: Not Available
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL:
| Type | Amount |
|---|---|
| Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $25 |
| Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $62 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $6 |
| Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $709 |
| Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $13,293 |
| Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $70 |
| Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $1,949 |
| Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $560 |
| Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $297 |
| Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $4,439 |
| Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $559 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $3,092 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $416 |
| Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,026 |
| Total (Complete Episode) | $26,502 |
Infection Rates at SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
These measures show how often patients at SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.
| Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 380.00 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 0.24 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 819.00 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 0.43 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | -- / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | 2.97 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 36.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 1.01 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery | 0.00 / Same |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | 34.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | 0.28 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 4,842.00 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 0.09 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia | Not Available / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | -- / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 2.49 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 4,239.00 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 1.21 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 0.00 / Same |
How SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Top Hospitals in FAYETTEVILLE, AR
Worst Hospitals in FAYETTEVILLE, AR
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
| Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for heart attack patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for COPD patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for heart failure patients | 12.8% | SAME |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients | 19.4% | SAME |
| Death rate for stroke patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Pressure ulcer rate | 0.45% | SAME |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.24% | SAME |
| In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.09% | SAME |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 2.39% | SAME |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.54% | SAME |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 7.55% | SAME |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 3.7% | SAME |
| Postoperative sepsis rate | 4.99% | SAME |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 1.98% | SAME |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 1.01% | SAME |
| CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 0.91% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Groups Affiliated with SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL
There are 130 doctors and 47 medical groups that are affiliated with SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL.
Affiliated Doctor Groups
- MERCY CLINIC FORT SMITH COMMUNITIES
- IES HSP ARKANSAS PLLC
- SHAMSUL ALAM MD PA
- THE ORTHOPAEDIC AND JOINT PRESERVATION CENTER OF ARKANSAS, P.A.
- OZARK PHYSICAL THERAPY INC.
- FANDS PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC
- WH AR MEDICAL PLLC
- HOT SPRINGS INTERVENTIONAL PAIN MANAGEMENT PA
- WASHINGTON REGIONAL MEDICAL SYSTEM
- CAPITAL ANESTHESIA SOLUTIONS OF ARKANSAS, LLC
- ST. FRANCIS HOUSE NWA, INC.
- JAMES BLAIR BLANKENSHIP, PA
- SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS LLC
- NORTHWEST ARKANSAS PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES PA
- CHEROKEE NATION
- UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS
- RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES PA
- ROLLER WEIGHT LOSS INSTITUTE, INC.
- IES ARKANSAS PLLC
- INTEGRATED COMMUNITY CLINICS PA
- MEDICAL GROUP - STONECREST FP INC
- NORTHWEST PHYSICIANS LLC
- NORTHWEST BENTON COUNTY PHYSICIAN SERVICES LLC
- OZARK ORTHOPAEDICS, PA
- NORTHWEST ARKANSAS UROLOGY ASSOCIATES, PLLC
- ARKANSAS HEART HOSPITAL LLC
- CABERFAE EMERGENCY GROUP PC
- SILOAM SPRINGS CLINIC COMPANY LLC
- RETINA CENTER OF ARKANSAS PLLC
- INFECTIOUS DISEASE SPECIALISTS OF NORTHWEST ARKANSAS
- NORTHWEST ARKANSAS HBP SERVICES LLC
- FREEMAN NEOSHO HOSPITAL
- FREEMAN-OAK HILL HEALTH SYSTEM
- FLAGG EMERGENCY GROUP, PLLC
- ACCESS MEDICAL CLINIC ARKANSAS LLC
- HEALING ARTS CENTER L.L.C.
- SILOAM SPRINGS WOMENS CLINIC WOMENS CENTER
- ADVANCED HEALTH AND WELLNESS LLC
- FROEDTERT ANDTHE MEDICAL COLLEGE OF WISCONSIN COMMUNITY PHYSICIANS INC
- INFORME HEALTHCARE IL LLC
- ANESTHESIA OF ENID LLC
- GLOMAR MEDICAL INC
- KEVIN HANNAH LLC
- POWELL ORTHOPEDICS PA
- GENERAL JOHN J PERSHING MEMORIAL HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
- NEVADA CITY HOSPITAL
- NORTHEASTERN OKLAHOMA COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERS, INC
The list of medical professionals associated with SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with SILOAM SPRINGS REGIONAL HOSPITAL.
