CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY Review
Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY to other hospitals
Overall Hospital Rating: ; HCAPS approval: 57%
Database data as of November 08, 2023
A Review of the Data
Prepared by Richard Saunders as of November 08, 2023.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY, Survey Analysis.)
In the briefest summary, CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in LITTLE ROCK, AR. Its five star rating is 2 . Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 40007. It does provide emergency services. There are 424 medical professionals and 93 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY, emergency patients were charged $28,050. This is higher than the state average of $24,492. It is also higher than the national average of $24,355.
According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 57% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY, while only 13% did not recommend going to CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY
Address:
TWO ST VINCENT CIRCLE
LITTLE ROCK, AR
72205
(501) 552-3000
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
40007
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Voluntary non-profit - Private
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
| Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
|---|---|
| 1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
| 2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
| 3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
| N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY to the national results for similar facilities.
| Survey Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 70 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 22 % |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 78 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 6 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 16 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 67 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 23 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 66 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 24 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 77 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 6 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 17 % |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 85 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 4 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 11 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 74 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 19 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 71 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 21 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 51 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 32 % |
| Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 49 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 34 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 53 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 29 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 56 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 27 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 17 % |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 68 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 15 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 44 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 39 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 20 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 80 % |
| Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 24 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 76 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 15 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 85 % |
| Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 47 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 9 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 44 % |
| Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 52 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 10 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 38 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 51 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 7 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 42 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 39 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 9 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 52 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 50 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 26 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 24 % |
| Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 56 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 12 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 32 % |
| Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 17 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 25 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 58 % |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 13 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 57 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 30 % |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Cost of CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY: Not Available
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY:
| Type | Amount |
|---|---|
| Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $12 |
| Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $12 |
| Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $342 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $3 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $11 |
| Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $717 |
| Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $15,563 |
| Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $14 |
| Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $2,030 |
| Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $643 |
| Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $133 |
| Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $4,552 |
| Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $879 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,940 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $83 |
| Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,115 |
| Total (Complete Episode) | $28,050 |
Infection Rates at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY
These measures show how often patients at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.
| Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.77 / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.79 / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 17,180.00 / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 18.33 / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 22.00 / Same |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | 1.20 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.17 / Better |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.68 / Better |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 16,732.00 / Better |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 22.40 / Better |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 8.00 / Better |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | 0.36 / Better |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.17 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | 1.01 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 398.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 11.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 5.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery | 0.46 / Same |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | 63.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | 0.47 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | 1.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.12 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | 1.32 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 74,737.00 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 6.17 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 3.00 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia | 0.49 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.20 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.61 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 74,737.00 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 35.60 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 13.00 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 0.37 / Better |
How CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Top Hospitals in LITTLE ROCK, AR
Worst Hospitals in LITTLE ROCK, AR
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY
| Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | 3.2% | SAME |
| Death rate for heart attack patients | 11.6% | SAME |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients | 3.3% | SAME |
| Death rate for COPD patients | 9.5% | SAME |
| Death rate for heart failure patients | 12.4% | SAME |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients | 19.2% | SAME |
| Death rate for stroke patients | 16.7% | SAME |
| Pressure ulcer rate | 1.38% | Worse |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | 174.89% | SAME |
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.18% | SAME |
| In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.04% | SAME |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 2.58% | SAME |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.3% | SAME |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 9.36% | SAME |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 2.52% | SAME |
| Postoperative sepsis rate | 5.57% | SAME |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 0.8% | SAME |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 0.93% | SAME |
| CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 1.22% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Groups Affiliated with CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY
There are 424 doctors and 93 medical groups that are affiliated with CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY.
Affiliated Doctor Groups
- ST VINCENT MEDICAL GROUP
- MONTICELLO ESS LLC
- ST VINCENT INFIRMARY MEDICAL CENTER
- KIDNEY CARE CENTER, PLLC
- RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES PA
- SINGLETON ASSOCIATES PA
- TEXAS DIGESTIVE DISEASE CONSULTANTS PLLC
- ARKANSAS PATHOLOGY ASSOCIATES PA
- JEFFERSON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION INC
- ORTHOARKANSAS, PA
- SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS LLC
- FNP ASSOCIATES
- HEALTHSTAR PHYSICIANS OF HOT SPRINGS, PLLC
- SOUTHERN REGIONAL ANESTHESIOLOGY CONSULTANTS PLLC
- UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS
- CENTRAL ARKANSAS RADIATION THERAPY INSTITUTE INC
- GASTRO CLINICS OF ARKANSAS PLLC
- GREENBRIER EMERGENCY SERVICES, INC.
- SHILOH EMERGENCY GROUP PLLC
- JACK STEPHENS HEART INSTITUTE LLC
- WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
- CALIFORNIA PULMONARY ASSOCIATES INC
- WHITE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
- HCC OF WARREN HOSPITALIST, LLC
- HCC OF WARREN LLC
- BOWEN HEFLEY RHODES STEWART ORTHOPEDICS, PA
- ARKANSAS UROLOGY, P.A.
- ST. VINCENT PHYSICIAN CLINICS LLC
- NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES PA
- INPATIENT SOLUTIONS
- ARKANSAS OTOLARYNGOLOGY CENTER PA
- MIDDLE ARKANSAS SEDATION ASSOCIATES, PLLC
- ARKANSAS HEALTH GROUP
- INTERCOASTAL MEDICAL GROUP INC
- MORI BEAN AND BROOKS INC
- UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH FACULTY GROUP PRACTICE
- INTERPRETING PHYSICIAN ASSOCIATES INC
- M.S. CLINC OF ARKANSAS, LLC
- KATHRYN CHENAULT, MD, PA
- RENAL CONSULTANTS
- BAPTIST HEALTH
- JEFFERSON REGIONAL ANESTHESIA LLC
- PREMIER ANESTHESIA OF ARKANSAS PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
- HILL MEDICAL SERVICES PLLC
- ARKANSAS LONGEVITY CENTER PLLC
- ARKANSAS SURGICAL HOSPITAL LLC
- HCC OF EL DORADO LLC
- INFECTIOUS DISEASE RESOURCE GROUP LLP
- ARKANSAS FAMILY CARE NETWORK
- TRIANGLE ANESTHESIA GROUP, PSC
- GASTRO ANESTHESIA PLLC
- CONWAY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER INC
- FOREFRONT-RUSH MEDICAL SERVICES PC
- WHITE RIVER HEALTH SYSTEM INC
- ARKANSAS ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES PLLC
- ARKANSAS PALLIATIVE CARE, LLC
- YOUNGS PROFESSIONAL SERVICES LLC
- HILLCREST FAMILY PRACTICE CLINIC, INC
- OSF MULTI-SPECIALTY GROUP
- URGENT SPECIALTY ASSOCIATES OF TEXAS PLLC
- ADVANCED MONITORING SERVICES, INC
- BRIAN RUSH SIMPSON MD PLLC
- ARKANSAS HEART HOSPITAL LLC
- ARKANSAS HEART HOSPITAL RURAL HEALTH SERVICES, LLC
- ANESTHESIA SPECIALISTS OF ARKANSAS
- UT PHYSICIANS
- PAIN CLINICS OF CENTRAL CALIFORNIA, INC.
- ARKANSAS NEUROSURGERY BRAIN AND SPINE CLINIC P.A.
- FANDS PHYSICAL THERAPY, INC
- MARTIN KNEE AND SPORTS MEDICINE CENTER, PA
- FLAXVENTURES LLC
- COASTAL SPINE INSTITUTE PC
- PRIME ENDOCRINOLOGY LLC
- MERCY CLINIC FORT SMITH COMMUNITIES
- CHI ST VINCENT MEDICAL GROUP HOT SPRINGS
- FAULKNER EMERGENCY GROUP, PLLC
- DREAM TEAM ANESTHESIA LLC
- HOT SPRINGS RADIOLOGY SERVICES, LTD
- LITTLE ROCK NEUROSURGERY CLINIC, PA
- THE BRIDGEWAY LLC
- HOSPITAL MEDICINE
- SADIQ AND RAINOSEK PLLC
- ALI RAJA MD PA
- OUACHITA REGIONAL ANESTHESIA PLLC
- PROPER PAIN SOLUTIONS PLLC
- CAL MED PHYSICIANS AND SURGEONS INC
- ARROWHEAD NEUROSURGICAL MEDICAL GROUP INC
- PREMIER GASTROENTEROLOGY ASSOCIATES PLLC
- ESS HOSPITALIST LLC
- MAUI HEALTH SYSTEM A KAISER FOUNDATION HOSPITALS LLC
- ASSOCIATED RADIOLOGISTS LTD
- MORRILTON MEDICAL CLINIC, P.A.
- ST ANTHONYS HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
The list of medical professionals associated with CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with CHI-ST VINCENT INFIRMARY.
