FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES Review
Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES to other hospitals
Overall Hospital Rating: ; HCAPS approval: 68%
Database data as of January 31, 2024
A Review of the Data
Prepared by Richard Saunders as of January 31, 2024.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, Survey Analysis.)
In the briefest summary, FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in NORFOLK, NE. Its five star rating is 5 . Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Church. The facility's Medicare ID is 280125. It does provide emergency services. There are 250 medical professionals and 82 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, emergency patients were charged $26,092. This is lower than the state average of $26,737. It is also higher than the national average of $25,828.
According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 68% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, while only 4% did not recommend going to FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES
Address:
2700 WEST NORFOLK AVE
NORFOLK, NE
68701
(402) 371-4880
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
280125
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Voluntary non-profit - Church
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
| Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
|---|---|
| 1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
| 2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
| 3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
| N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES to the national results for similar facilities.
| Survey Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 81 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 3 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 16 % |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 86 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 2 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 12 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 79 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 3 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 78 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 5 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 81 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 5 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 14 % |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 87 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 3 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 80 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 5 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 15 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 75 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 63 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 6 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 31 % |
| Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 59 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 34 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 67 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 5 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 28 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 61 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 19 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 20 % |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 77 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 15 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 45 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 31 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 24 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 90 % |
| Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 12 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 88 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 9 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 91 % |
| Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 46 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 6 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 48 % |
| Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 53 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 5 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 42 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 48 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 5 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 47 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 36 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 8 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 56 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 74 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 9 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 17 % |
| Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 63 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 6 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 31 % |
| Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 7 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 22 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 71 % |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 4 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 68 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 28 % |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Cost of FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES: Not Available
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES:
| Type | Amount |
|---|---|
| Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $5 |
| Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $1 |
| Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $29 |
| Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $501 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $19 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $9 |
| Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $689 |
| Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $12,011 |
| Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $18 |
| Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $1,300 |
| Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $272 |
| Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $221 |
| Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $2,932 |
| Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,395 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $5,484 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $87 |
| Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,119 |
| Total (Complete Episode) | $26,092 |
Infection Rates at FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES
These measures show how often patients at FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.
| Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 1,271.00 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 0.88 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 1,260.00 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 0.91 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 1.00 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 33.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 0.85 / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 1.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | 5.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | 0.04 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 23,973.00 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 0.62 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia | Not Available / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | -- / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 0.62 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 23,909.00 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 4.85 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Better |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 0.00 / Better |
How FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Worst Hospitals in NORFOLK, NE
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES
| Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | 3.1% | SAME |
| Death rate for heart attack patients | 12.4% | SAME |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients | 2.5% | SAME |
| Death rate for COPD patients | 8.4% | SAME |
| Death rate for heart failure patients | 13.7% | SAME |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients | 18.1% | SAME |
| Death rate for stroke patients | 16.6% | SAME |
| Pressure ulcer rate | 0.25% | SAME |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | 162.55% | SAME |
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.33% | SAME |
| In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.1% | SAME |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 3.03% | SAME |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.4% | SAME |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 10.16% | SAME |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 3.43% | SAME |
| Postoperative sepsis rate | 5.26% | SAME |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 1.92% | SAME |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 1.25% | SAME |
| CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 0.96% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Groups Affiliated with FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES
There are 250 doctors and 82 medical groups that are affiliated with FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES.
Affiliated Doctor Groups
- SUNNY MEADOW MEDICAL CLINIC PC
- UNITED HOSPITAL CENTER INC
- FAITH REGIONAL PHYSICIAN SERVICES LLC
- WOMENS HEALTH OF NORTHEAST NEBRASKA PC
- SOUTHERN TIER PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE LLC
- UNITED HEALTH SERVICES HOSPITALS, INC.
- CHENANGO MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC
- PATHOLOGY MEDICAL SERVICES PC
- NORTH PLATTE NEBRASKA HOSPITAL CORPORATION
- NMG LLC
- TITUS COUNTY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- DIAGNOSTIC OUTPATIENT IMAGING PARTNERSHIP LTD
- VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS OF TEXAS I, PA
- SINGLETON ASSOCIATES PA
- BROADLAWNS MEDICAL CENTER
- PROVIDENCE MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- UNMC PHYSICIANS
- SANFORD HEALTH NETWORK
- YANKTON MEDICAL CLINIC PC
- MD WEST ONE, PC
- SONORAN RADIOLOGY LTD
- FOOT AND ANKLE CENTER OF NEBRASKA PC
- OMAHA ORTHOPEDIC CLINIC AND SPORTS MEDICINE PC
- SACRED HEART HEALTH SERVICES
- ALEGENT CREIGHTON HEALTH
- BLOOMFIELD MEDICAL CLINIC, PC
- SANFORD MEDICAL CENTER
- MOUNTAIN VIEW HOSPITAL LLC
- ANTELOPE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- CNOS PC
- FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES
- MONUMENT HEALTH RAPID CITY HOSPITAL, INC.
- HEMATOLOGY AND ONCOLOGY CONSULTANTS PC
- SPECIALISTS IN MEDICAL IMAGING SC
- VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS LLC
- COLUMBUS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC
- ALPHARAD INC
- RIVERWOOD ADVANCED DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING
- RADADVANTAGE A PROFESSIONAL CORPORATION
- CHANDLER RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES LLC
- SIOUXLAND ANESTHESIOLOGY LTD
- BRODSTONE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- MIDTOWN HEALTH CENTER INC
- INTERMOUNTAIN HEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC
- ST. GEORGE RADIOLOGY INC
- NORFOLK ANESTHESIA PARTNERS PC
- ADULT AND PEDIATRIC UROLOGY PC
- MIDWEST OB/GYN CLINIC, PC
- BELLEVUE PRIMARY HEALTHCARE PC
- ELKHORN VALLEY FAMILY MEDICINE, PC
- METROPOLITAN HOSPITAL AUTHORITY
- DYNAMIC RADIOLOGY TENNESSEE PC
- NORTHSTAR ANESTHESIA III PA
- SCRIPPS CARDIOLOGY MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- COASTAL CARDIOVASCULAR CARE INC
- OASIS COUNSELING INTERNATIONAL
- SOUTHERN OREGON NEUROSURGICAL AND SPINE ASSOCIATES, PC
- ORTHOWEST, LLC
- CITY OF GENOA
- NEBRASKA HEALTH AND WELLNESS CLINIC LLC
- SIOUXLAND UROLOGY ASSOCIATES PC
- METROPOLITAN ANESTHESIA NETWORK LLP
- MIDWEST DERMATOLOGY CLINIC, P.C.
- CHI HEALTH CLINIC SPECIALTY LLC
- SHELBY COUNTY CHRIS A MYRTUE MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- ONCOLOGY ASSOCIATES, PC
- OBSTETRICAL AND GYNECOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES OF CORPUS CHRISTI
- ALEGENT CREIGHTON CLINIC
- OSF MULTI-SPECIALTY GROUP
- PONCA TRIBE OF NEBRASKA
- CITY OF BROOKINGS
- HEALTH AT HOME CONSULTANTS LLC
- MERCY HEALTH PHYSICIANS CINCINNATI SPECIALTY CARE LLC
- BRYAN PHYSICIAN NETWORK
- BOONE COUNTY HEALTH CENTER
- OSMOND GENERAL HOSPITAL INC
- STATE OF NEBRASKA DEPT OF ADMIN SERVICES
- AVERA ST ANTHONYS HOSPITAL
- AVERA ST MARYS
- ST CLAIR PROFESSIONAL SERVICES INC
- PARKVIEW HEALTH SYSTEM INC
- MYMICHIGAN MEDICAL GROUP
The list of medical professionals associated with FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES.
