OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR Review
Get Information, Ratings, Surveys, and Compare OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR to other hospitals
Overall Hospital Rating: ; HCAPS approval: 59%
Database data as of January 31, 2024
A Review of the Data
Prepared by Richard Saunders as of January 31, 2024.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") distributes more than 80 tables of data on hospitals on a quarterly basis. That is a lot of information to pour through to try and build a comprehensive review of OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR. Luckily, we are here to help! I’ve put together this page to help you to get a better idea of what the hospital does, who is affiliated with it, share any patient survey data and much more. (If you want to jump to a specific section of the review, here are the section headers: General Hospital Data, Ratings, Cost Analysis, Infections, Comparison, Nearby Skilled Nursing Facilities, Doctors Associated with OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR, Survey Analysis.)
In the briefest summary, OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR is one of the types of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is in OTTAWA, IL. Its five star rating is 4 . Its type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 140110. It does provide emergency services. There are 509 medical professionals and 147 doctor groups affiliated with the hospital. On average at OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR, emergency patients were charged $21,782. This is lower than the state average of $25,739. It is also lower than the national average of $25,828.
According to the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 59% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR, while only 6% did not recommend going to OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR
Address:
1100 E NORRIS DRIVE
OTTAWA, IL
61350
(815) 433-3100
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
140110
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Voluntary non-profit - Private
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
---|---|
1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR to the national results for similar facilities.
Survey Question | Response |
---|---|
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 79 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 5 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 16 % |
Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 87 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 3 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 10 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 75 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 6 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 19 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 75 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 6 % |
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 19 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 79 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 6 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 15 % |
Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 85 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 4 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 11 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 77 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 6 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 17 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 73 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 7 % |
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 20 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 60 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 11 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 29 % |
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 55 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 12 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 33 % |
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 65 % |
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 10 % |
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 25 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 59 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 21 % |
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 20 % |
Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 73 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 9 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 18 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 45 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 33 % |
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 22 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 12 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 88 % |
Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 12 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 88 % |
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 11 % |
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 89 % |
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 46 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 6 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 48 % |
Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 52 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 7 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 41 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 46 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 6 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 48 % |
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 38 % |
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 6 % |
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 56 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 65 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 10 % |
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 25 % |
Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 54 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 12 % |
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 34 % |
Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 11 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 25 % |
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 64 % |
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 6 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 59 % |
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 35 % |
Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
Cost of OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR: Not Available
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR:
Type | Amount |
---|---|
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $20 |
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $19 |
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $117 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $31 |
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $13 |
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $796 |
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $8,743 |
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $15 |
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $781 |
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $877 |
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $203 |
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $2,205 |
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $851 |
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $5,803 |
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $109 |
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,199 |
Total (Complete Episode) | $21,782 |
Infection Rates at OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR
These measures show how often patients at OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally.
Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
---|---|
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 1,029.00 / Not Available |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 0.68 / Not Available |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 1.00 / Not Available |
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | Not Available / Not Available |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.33 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 6.42 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 1,607.00 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 1.03 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 2.00 / Same |
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | 1.94 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | -- / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | 2.79 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 35.00 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 1.08 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Same |
SSI - Colon Surgery | 0.00 / Same |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | 23.00 / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | 0.21 / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 17,440.00 / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 0.55 / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 1.00 / Not Available |
MRSA Bacteremia | Not Available / Not Available |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.10 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.05 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 16,699.00 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 7.79 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 3.00 / Same |
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 0.39 / Same |
How OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR
Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
---|---|---|
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
Death rate for heart attack patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
Death rate for CABG surgery patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
Death rate for COPD patients | 9.1% | SAME |
Death rate for heart failure patients | 15.1% | SAME |
Death rate for pneumonia patients | 18.7% | SAME |
Death rate for stroke patients | 15.9% | SAME |
Pressure ulcer rate | 0.28% | SAME |
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | NA | Not Enough Data |
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | 0.23% | SAME |
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | 0.09% | SAME |
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | 2.7% | SAME |
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | 1.53% | SAME |
Postoperative respiratory failure rate | 7.8% | SAME |
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | 3.5% | SAME |
Postoperative sepsis rate | 4.98% | SAME |
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | 1.91% | SAME |
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | 0.98% | SAME |
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | 0.86% | SAME |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Facility Name | Overall Rating |
---|---|
Arc at Streator | 5: |
Pavilion of Ottawa | 5: |
Manor Court of Peru | 5: |
Allure of Mendota | 5: |
Arc at Dwight | 4: |
Aperion Care Toluca | 3: |
Pleasant View Luther Home | 3: |
La Salle County Nursing Home | 3: |
Allure of Peru | 3: |
Pearl at The Tillers | 3: |
Hillside Rehab and Care Center | 2: |
Parker Nursing and Rehab Center | 1: |
Aperion Care Marseilles | 1: |
Aperion Care Spring Valley | 1: |
Park Pointe Healthcare and Rehab | 1: |
Arcadia Care Morris | 1: |
The Pavilion On Main Street | 1: |
Sandwich Rehab and Hcc | 1: |
Medical Groups Affiliated with OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR
There are 509 doctors and 147 medical groups that are affiliated with OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR.
Affiliated Doctor Groups
- PRESENCE HEALTHCARE SERVICES
- OSF MULTI-SPECIALTY GROUP
- NORTHWESTERN MEDICAL FACULTY FOUNDATION
- AGHA MEDICAL INC
- THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS
- MORRIS HOSPITAL
- IOWA PHYSICIANS CLINIC MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- EDWARD HOSPITAL
- ELMHURST MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- RENALCARE ASSOCIATES, S.C.
- ROCKFORD RADIOLOGY ASSOC
- SPECIALISTS IN MEDICAL IMAGING SC
- CIRA MICHIGAN PC
- CENTRAL ILLINOIS RADIOLOGICAL ASSOCIATES LTD
- OTTAWA REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND HEALTHCARE CENTER
- GAILEY EYE CLINIC, LTD
- HEART CARE CENTERS OF ILLINOIS, S.C.
- MENDOTA COMMUNITY HOSPITAL
- ONCOLOGY-HEMATOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF CENTRAL ILLINOIS P C
- VEIN ASSOCIATES OF NORTHWEST INDIANA LLC
- RADIOLOGIC ASSOCIATES OF NORTHWEST INDIANA PC
- KENNEKUK EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS LLC
- SHEMAUGER EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS LLC
- EM STRATEGIES LTD
- SAINT JAMES HOSPITAL
- CENTER FOR FOOT AND ANKLE SURGERY LTD
- SWEDISH COVENANT MANAGEMENT SERVICES INC
- SOUTHEASTERN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS LLC
- FREEPORT MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
- CENTRAL ILLINOIS PATHOLOGY, SC
- CEPAMERICA ILLINOIS LLP
- ILLINOIS UROLOGIC HEALTH SURGEONS SC
- AISHLING OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, S.C.
- MOUNT SINAI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
- STANFORD HEALTH CARE
- UNITED SHOCKWAVE SERVICES LTD
- UROPARTNERS LLC
- DERMATOLOGY AND MOHS SURGERY INSTITUTE LTD
- OSF HEALTHCARE SYSTEM
- PROCTOR HEALTH SYSTEMS
- LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
- TEVERBAUGH CROLAND AND MUELLER OB/GYN AND ASSOCIATES, S.C.
- ANESTHESIA ASSOCIATES, LTD
- INDIANA UNIVERSITY HEALTH CARE ASSOCIATES INC
- ICEM-WISHARD LLC
- ALLINA HEALTH SYSTEM
- MERCY MEDICAL CENTER
- MODERN PAIN CONSULTANTS
- 24 ON PHYSICIANS PC
- AURORA MEDICAL GROUP, INC.
- DUPAGE MEDICAL GROUP LTD
- VALLEY PAIN CARE CENTERS, LTD
- GRUNDY RADIOLOGISTS INC
- GARY FINKELSTEIN MD EYE ASSOCIATES SC
- SAINT FRANCIS MEDICAL CENTER
- MIDWEST ORTHOPAEDICS AT RUSH LLC
- ORTHOMIDWEST PLLC
- RCI (WRS), LLC.
- ANESTHESIA PAIN SERVICES LLC
- KEMELL HEALTH LLC
- ILLINOIS VETERANS HOME AT MANTENO
- CGH MEDICAL CENTER
- CARLE WEST PHYSICIAN GROUP INC
- MORRISON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL DISTRICT
- NORTH AMERICAN PARTNERS IN ANESTHESIA ILLINOIS LLC
- NORTHSTAR ANESTHESIA OF ILLINOIS, LLC
- UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY
- OSU RADIOLOGY LLC
- OPEN ADVANCED MRI OF PORTLAND PS
- OPEN ADVANCED MRI OF VANCOUVER PS
- ROCKFORD HEALTH PHYSICIANS
- CENTRAL DUPAGE PHYSICIAN GROUP
- EDGEWOOD CLINICAL SERVICES P.C.
- MERCY HEALTH SYSTEM CORPORATION
- NORTH PLATTE NEBRASKA HOSPITAL CORPORATION
- PENN STATE HEALTH COMMUNITY MEDICAL GROUP LLC
- IHC-LITCHFIELD EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS LLC
- RIVERSIDE EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS LLC
- ILLINOIS VALLEY SURGICAL ASSOCIATES, SC
- LUCIDSOLUTIONS INC
- UNIVERSITY DIAGNOSTIC INSTITUTE WINTER PARK PLLC
- QMG, LLC
- WEST HERNANDO DIAGNOSTIC AND MR CENTER, INC
- CONNECTICUT IMAGING PARTNERS LLC
- DIAGNOSTIC OUTPATIENT IMAGING PARTNERSHIP LTD
- RESILIENCE HEALTHCARE - LAKEFRONT MEDICAL ASSOCIATES LLC
- FOOT AND ANKLE ASSOCIATES LTD
- UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SFGH MEDICAL GROUP
- SARAH BUSH LINCOLN HEALTH CENTER
- PERMANENTE MEDICAL GROUP INC
- EMERGENCY MEDICINE SPECIALISTS SC
- HOOPESTON EMERGENCY MEDICINE SPECIALISTS LTD
- IDEAL MRI LLC
- GIBSON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
- NORTHEAST NEPHROLOGY CONSULTANTS
- KIDNEY CARE CENTER ROCKFORD LLC
- DIASPORA RADIOLOGY SC
- STATE UNIVERSITY OF IOWA
- MONTEFIORE MEDICAL CENTER
- CLARKSVILLE EMERGENCY GROUP, PC
- NORTHWEST RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES SC
- DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY SPECIALISTS, S.C.
- UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO
- CEP AMERICA LLC
- ADVANCED UROLOGY ASSOCIATES SC
- MARYLAND IMAGING NETWORK PC
- RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING SPECIALISTS OF LAKELAND
- LEGACY HEALTHCARE SERVICES INC
- GERIATRIC PROFESSIONAL SERVICES SC
- ADVOCATE HEALTH AND HOSPITALS CORPORATION
- MCHENRY RADIOLOGISTS AND IMAGING ASSOCIATES SC
- PINNACLE DERMATOLOGY SC
- MOBILE ANESTHESIOLOGISTS CHICAGO PLLC
- FRANCISCAN PHYSICIAN NETWORK
- DIGESTIVE HEALTH ASSOCIATES PC
- RED RIVER CONSULTANTS INC
- VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS OF TEXAS I, PA
- HOPEDALE MEDICAL FOUNDATION
- ORTHOPEDIC AND SPORTS ENHANCEMENT CENTER, LLC
- PAIN AND SPINE INSTITUTE LLC
- COMMUNITY HOME PHYSICIANS LLC
- RUSH UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
- YUMA REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
- PROSCAN RADIOLOGY, LLC
- CHINATOWN TRUE CARE MEDICAL PLLC
- PROSCAN NCH IMAGING LLC
- DHP OF NORTH CAROLINA PC
- ACUTE CARE SURGERY MEDICAL GROUP INC
- IMRAD OF VIRGINIA PLLC
- DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY AND IMAGING LLC
- WAKE FOREST HEALTH NETWORK LLC
- GREENSBORO RADIOLOGY PA
- RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES OF ROANOKE, PC
- CENTRA MEDICAL GROUP LLC
- CENTRA HEALTH, INC
- ROANOKE IMAGING LLC
- REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES INC
- ROCKFORD UROLOGICAL ASSOCIATES LTD
- IHC-SPRINGFIELD EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS LLC
- IHC-ST NICHOLAS EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS, LLC
- GRAHAM HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
- DUPAGE EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS LTD
- GUNDERSEN LUTHERAN MEDICAL CENTER INC
- MOUNDVIEW MEMORIAL HOSPITAL AND CLINICS INC
- TRI-COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITAL INC
- GENESIS HEALTH SYSTEM
- ADVANCED BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SERVICES LLC
The list of medical professionals associated with OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR is very long, so we have added another pages. See a list of medical professionals associated with OSF SAINT ELIZABETH MDL CTR.