JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL in WAURIKA, OK:
Reviews, Ratings, Surveys, Comparisons, Find a Doctor, etc.
Overall Rating: Not Available
Database data was released on January 25, 2023
About JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL
Rating:
Not Available
NursingHomeDatabase has the latest reviews, location, phone numbers, list of medical professionaals and other information about JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL.
JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL is one of a type of hospitals called Critical Access Hospitals. It is located in WAURIKA, OK. Its five star rating is Not Available. It's type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 371311.
EMERGENCY SERVICES: It does provide emergency services.
There are 45 medical professionals affiliated with JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL.
According to a survey by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, only Not Available% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL, while Not Available% did not recommend going to JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL.
The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL
Address:
INTERSECTION HYWS 81 & 70
WAURIKA, OK
73573
(580) 228-2344
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
371311
Type:
Critical Access Hospitals
Ownership:
Voluntary non-profit - Private
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL
Overall Rating: Not Available
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
The methodology used to calculate Overall Star Ratings involves multiple steps to select, standardize, and calculate scores based on Care Compare measures. Overall Star Ratings are created using this seven-step process:
- Selection and standardization of measures for inclusion in the Overall Star Rating
- Assignment of measures to groups
- Calculation and standardization of measure group scores
- Calculation of hospital summary scores as a weighted average of available group scores
- Application of minimum thresholds for receiving an Overall Star Rating
- Assignment of hospitals to peer groups based on their number of measure groups (3, 4, or 5)
- Application of clustering algorithm to categorize summary scores into star ratings
For each hospital, a hospital summary score is calculated by taking the weighted average of the hospital’s scores for each measure group. The table below shows the weight applied to each measure group. The hospital summary score is then used to assign hospitals to star ratings, using k-means clustering within each peer group.
| Measure group | Weight used in calculation |
|---|---|
| Mortality | 22% |
| Safety | 22% |
| Readmission | 22% |
| Patient Experience | 22% |
| Timely & Effective Care | 12% |
Note that these percentage weights are out of 100%. If a hospital has no measures in a certain measure group, the weighted percentage is redistributed proportionally to the other measure groups. For example, if a hospital had no measures in the Timely & Effective Care category, the 12% weight would be redistributed evenly as 25% for each of the Mortality, Safety of Care, Readmission and Patient Experience groups.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
| Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
|---|---|
| 1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
| 2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
| 3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
| N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Cost of JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL: Not Available
More Information about the calculation of Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary for JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL: The measure assesses Medicare Part A and Part B payments for services provided to a JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL during a spending-per-beneficiary episode that spans from three days prior to an inpatient hospital admission through 30 days after discharge. The payments included in this measure are price-standardized and risk-adjusted. The payment measures for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement are estimates of payments associated with a 30-day episode of care for heart attack, heart failure, or pneumonia, or a 90-day episode of care for hip/knee replacement. The episode of care begins with the admission. For the heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia measures, payments across multiple care settings, services, and supplies (inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, home health, hospice, physician/clinical laboratory/ambulance services, durable medical equipment, prosthetics/orthotics, and supplies) are assessed for the next 30 days. For hip/knee replacement, the measure includes all payments for the next 30 days but also includes payments related to the hip/knee replacement for days 31 – 90. For the heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement payment measures, payment rates are provided in the downloadable database and presented on the Hospital Care Compare website in terms of dollars. Hospitals’ rates are compared to the national mean payment to categorize whether a hospital’s payment rate is less than the national mean payment, no different than the national mean payment, or greater than the national mean payment, For some hospitals, the number of cases is too small to reliably compare their results to the national mean payment. The payment measures are not intended to be interpreted in isolation but to be considered in the context of existing quality measures such as CMS’s 30-day mortality measures for heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia, and the 90-day complication measure for hip/knee replacement.
Infection Rates at JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL
These measures show how often patients at JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally. HAI measures provide information on infections that occur while the patient is in the hospital and include: central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), catheterassociated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), surgical site infection (SSI) from colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) blood laboratory-identified events (bloodstream infections), and Clostridium difficile (C.diff.) laboratory-identified events (intestinal infections). The HAI measures show how often patients at JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to like hospitals. The CDC calculates a Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) which may take into account the type of patient care location, number of patients with an existing infection, laboratory methods, hospital affiliation with a medical school, bed size of the hospital, patient age, and classification of patient health. SIRs are calculated for the hospital, the state, and the nation. Hospitals’ SIRs are compared to the national benchmark to determine if hospitals’ performance on these measures is better than the national benchmark (lower), no different than the national benchmark, or worse than the national benchmark (higher). The HAI measures apply to all patients treated in acute care hospitals, including adult, pediatric, neonatal, Medicare, and non-Medicare patients.
| Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 155.00 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 0.04 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 61.00 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 0.04 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Colon Surgery | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 417.00 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 0.01 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia | Not Available / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 417.00 / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 0.09 / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | Not Available / Not Available |
How JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Worst Hospitals in WAURIKA, OK
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL
| Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for heart attack patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for COPD patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for heart failure patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for stroke patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Pressure ulcer rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative sepsis rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | NA | Not Enough Data |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
| Facility Name | Overall Rating |
|---|---|
| Jefferson County Nursing Home | 5: |
| Meadville Convalescent Home | 4: |
| Natchez Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center | 4: |
| Adams County Nursing Center | 1: |
| Glenburney Health Care and Rehabilitation Center | 1: |
| Claiborne County Senior Care | 1: |
Medical Professsionals Affiliated with JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL
These are the doctors affliated with this hospital:
- SHERRIE BURTON ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
- RANDALL CARTER ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - SAINTS MEDICAL GROUP, LLC )
- JUAN CORNEJO ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- DEMETRA COX ( FAMILY PRACTICE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- CHRISTOPHER CRIMMINS ( UROLOGY - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- DAN CRISWELL ( ADDICTION MEDICINE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- THOMAS CROW ( FAMILY PRACTICE - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
- MEREDITH DEWITTE ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- ADAM DUKE ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- ANGELA GIBBONS ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - FALLING WATER MEDICAL ASSOCIATES PLLC )
- MYRA GREGORY ( FAMILY PRACTICE - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
- CHRISTOPHER HERNDON ( FAMILY PRACTICE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- JENNIFER HIEBLER ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- SVEN HOCHHEIMER ( NEUROSURGERY - NEUROLOGICAL SURGERY SPECIALIST OF NORTH TEXAS PLLC )
- MELISSA HURST ( FAMILY PRACTICE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- JEFFREY JONES ( FAMILY PRACTICE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- JULIAN LOWELL ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - SOUTH CENTRAL EMERGENCY SERVICES, PC )
- ANDRE MAY ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - HCC DUNCAN INC )
- FRANCIS MCGOURAN ( FAMILY PRACTICE - FALLING WATER MEDICAL ASSOCIATES PLLC )
- ABBIE MCLEMORE ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY CLINIC OKLAHOMA COMMUNITIES )
- LORA MINSON ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- MARIA MITHLO ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- BRENDA MULLINS ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- NATHAN MURRAY ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- LAURA MYRICK ( FAMILY PRACTICE - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
- JOSE NAJERA ( HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY - CANCER CENTERS OF SOUTHWEST OKLAHOMA, LLC )
- MARK NEWEY ( FAMILY PRACTICE )
- REGGIE PENNYPACKER ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - REGGIE PENNYPACKER, APRN-CNP, PLLC )
- PHILLIP PRICE ( FAMILY PRACTICE - SOUTH CENTRAL EMERGENCY SERVICES, PC )
- HARRELL PROCTOR ( FAMILY PRACTICE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- MIGUEL SABEDRA ( FAMILY PRACTICE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- MELISSA SCHRECKENGOST ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
- EMILY SCHRICK ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
- JAMES SHORT ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- WILLIAM STEWART ( FAMILY PRACTICE - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
- MARIA TATE ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
- STEVEN TATE ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- ANGELA THAYER ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - GDN LLC )
- MICHELLE VANNOY ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- KRYSTAL VONFELDT ( FAMILY PRACTICE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- KATY WARREN-BARNETT ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- PRESTON WATERS ( FAMILY PRACTICE - SOLUTIONS PRACTICE MANAGEMENT )
- JOSHUA WATKINS ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS OF MID-AMERICA PC )
- CAROL WEDDLE ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
- ANNALIESA ZUMWALT ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - DUNCAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL, INC. )
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for JEFFERSON COUNTY HOSPITAL to the national results for similar facilities.
| Survey Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | Not Available % |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | Not Available % |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | Not Available % |
| Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | Not Available % |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | Not Available % |
| Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | Not Available % |
| Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | Not Available % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | Not Available % |
| Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | Not Available % |
| Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | Not Available % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | Not Available % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | Not Available % |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | Not Available % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | Not Available % |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
