CIMA HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY LP: Reviews, Survey Results, and more
Hospice data as of November 08, 2022
CIMA HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY LP: General Information
Hospice services are typically delivered at a facility or in home, so the physical address for CIMA HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY LP is not terribly important. What is important is to find an agency that serves the geopgraphic area where the patient is living and to find a hospice provider that is responsive to their needs.
Certification Number: 671558
Certified Since: 02/06/2007
CIMA HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY LP: Service Area
CIMA HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY LP provides home healthcare services in these zip codes. Click on any ZIP Code to see other agencies servicing the ZIP Code.
78539 77015 77064 78040 78041 78043 78044 78045 78046 78076 78501 78503 78504 78516 78520 78521 78522 78526 78535 78537 78538 78540 78541 78542 78543 78548 78549 78550 78551 78552 78553 78557 78558 78559 78560 78562 78565 78566 78567 78569 78570 78572 78573 78574 78575 78576 78577 78578 78580 78582 78583 78584 78585 78586 78589 78592 78593 78595 78596 78599
Performance Data for CIMA HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY LP
Below are detailed results provided by CMS related to the performance of CIMA HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY LP. If state level results are available a comparison to state averages is shown.
| Hospice and Palliative Care Treatment Preferences | 100 % |
| Beliefs & Values Addressed (if desired by the patient) | 100 % |
| Hospice and Palliative Care Pain Screening | 100 % |
| Hospice and Palliative Care Pain Assessment | 99.6 % |
| Hospice and Palliative Care Dyspnea Screening | 100 % |
| Hospice and Palliative Care Dyspnea Treatment | 100 % |
| Patient Treated with an Opioid Who Are Given a Bowel Regimen | 100 % |
| Hospice and Palliative Care Composite Process Measure | 99.7 % |
| Hospice Visits in the Last Days of Life | Not Available |
| Hospice Care Index Overall Score | Not Available |
| CHC/GIP provided (%days) | Not Available |
| Gaps in nursing visits (% elections) | Not Available |
| Early live discharges (% live discharges) | Not Available |
| Late live discharges (% live discharges) | Not Available |
| Burdensome transitions, Type 1 (% live discharges) | Not Available |
| Burdensome transitions, Type 2 (% live discharges) | Not Available |
| Per-beneficiary spending (U.S. dollars $) | Not Available |
| Nurse care minutes per routine home care days (minutes) | Not Available |
| Skilled nursing minutes on weekends (% minutes) | Not Available |
| Visits near death (% decedents) | Not Available |
Patient Survey Results for CIMA HOSPICE OF THE VALLEY LP
The Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("CAHPS") Hospice Survey was designed to measure and assess the experiences of patients who died while receiving hospice care, as well as the experiences of their informal primary caregivers. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") developed the CAHPS Hospice Survey with input from many stakeholders, including other government agencies, industry stakeholders, consumer groups, and other key individuals and organizations involved in hospice care. (More information.)
Since the CAHPS Hospice Survey focuses on experiences of care, implementation of the survey supports the following national priorities for improving care: involving patients and families in care and promoting effective communication and coordination.
The standardized 47 question CAHPS Hospice Survey instrument is composed of the following measures: Communication with Family, Getting Timely Help, Treating Patient with Respect, Emotional and Spiritual Support, Help for Pain and Symptoms, Training Family to Care for Patient, Rating of this Hospice, and Willingness to Recommend this Hospice.
Higher Scores are better. Results are available on a facility basis. Averages for each state and for the nation are also available. Allf othis information is shown below.
| The hospice team did |not| provide the right amount of emotional and spiritual support |
12
(State: 11 /
Nat: 10 ) Better Than State Avg. / Better Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team provided the right amount of emotional and spiritual support |
88
(State: 89 /
Nat: 90 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| Caregivers rated the hospice agency a 6 or lower |
4
(State: 6 /
Nat: 5 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| Caregivers rated the hospice agency a 7 or 8 |
11
(State: 14 /
Nat: 14 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| Caregivers rated the hospice agency a 9 or 10 |
85
(State: 80 /
Nat: 81 ) Better Than State Avg. / Better Than Nat. Avg. |
| NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospice |
4
(State: 6 /
Nat: 5 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| YES, they would probably recommend the hospice |
9
(State: 12 /
Nat: 11 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| YES, they would definitely recommend the hospice |
87
(State: 82 /
Nat: 84 ) Better Than State Avg. / Better Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team sometimes or never treated the patient with respect |
2
(State: 3 /
Nat: 2 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team usually treated the patient with respect |
6
(State: 7 /
Nat: 7 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team always treated the patient with respect |
92
(State: 90 /
Nat: 91 ) Better Than State Avg. / Better Than Nat. Avg. |
| The patient sometimes or never got the help they needed for pain and symptoms |
8
(State: 11 /
Nat: 10 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| The patient usually got the help they needed for pain and symptoms |
12
(State: 14 /
Nat: 15 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| The patient always got the help they needed for pain and symptoms |
80
(State: 75 /
Nat: 75 ) Better Than State Avg. / Better Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team sometimes or never communicated well |
7
(State: 8 /
Nat: 7 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team usually communicated well |
10
(State: 12 /
Nat: 12 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team always communicated well |
83
(State: 80 /
Nat: 81 ) Better Than State Avg. / Better Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team sometimes or never provided timely help |
11
(State: 10 /
Nat: 10 ) Better Than State Avg. / Better Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team usually provided timely help |
8
(State: 14 /
Nat: 12 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| The hospice team always provided timely help |
81
(State: 76 /
Nat: 78 ) Better Than State Avg. / Better Than Nat. Avg. |
| They did not receive the training they needed |
6
(State: 10 /
Nat: 9 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| They somewhat received the training they needed |
13
(State: 15 /
Nat: 15 ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
| They definitely received the training they needed |
81
(State: 75 /
Nat: 76 ) Better Than State Avg. / Better Than Nat. Avg. |
| Family caregiver survey rating |
Not Applicable
(State: NA /
Nat: NA ) Worse Than State Avg. / Worse Than Nat. Avg. |
