CHAIN ANALYSIS

Analysis Report of AVAMERE Nursing Home Chain

At NursingHomeDatabase.com, we believe that understanding nursing home chains is crucial for families, policymakers, and healthcare providers. Chain ownership can significantly impact care quality, staffing levels, and operational practices across multiple facilities. This comprehensive analysis provides insights into AVAMERE's performance across all their facilities.

The analysis is derived from data that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services ("CMS") provides, including monthly reports with ratings, staffing levels, deficiencies, and facility characteristics. This data helps illuminate the overall performance and trends within the chain.

Chain Overview

Data as of June 1, 2026

Basic Information

Chain Name:	AVAMERE
Chain ID:	58
Number of Facilities:	29
Total Beds:	0
States Operating In:	2
States:	Oregon, Washington
Average Beds per Facility:	0

Quality Performance

Average Overall Rating:	3.1 Stars
5-Star Facilities:	6 (20.7%)
1-Star Facilities:	3 (10.3%)
5-Star to 1-Star Ratio:	2.0:1
Facilities with Safety Concerns:	2 (6.9%)
Avg. Staffing Hours/Resident:	4.75 hrs/day

Chain Average CMS Ratings

How AVAMERE performs on average across all CMS rating categories:

3.1

Overall Rating

2.7

Health Inspection

4.1

Staffing

3.7

Quality Measures

Business Profile

Ownership Structure

For profit - Limited Liability company 18 facilities (62.1%)

For profit - Corporation 10 facilities (34.5%)

For profit - Partnership 1 facilities (3.4%)

Facility Characteristics

Large Facilities (120+ beds) 0 (0.0%)

CCRC Facilities 1

Hospital-Based 0

Certification Types:

Medicare and Medicaid: 29 facilities

All Facilities in AVAMERE

Complete list of all nursing homes in this chain, sorted by state and facility name:

Facility Name	Location	Beds	Overall Rating	Staffing Rating	Quality Rating	Safety
Avamere Court at Keizer	KEIZER, OR	69	4	4	3	Good
Avamere Crestview of Portland	PORTLAND, OR	127	2	4	2	Good
Avamere Health Services of Rogue Valley	MEDFORD, OR	91	2	4	3	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Clackamas	GLADSTONE, OR	87	4	5	4	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Coos Bay	COOS BAY, OR	92	2	4	3	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Eugene	EUGENE, OR	92	1	4	3	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Hillsboro	HILLSBORO, OR	87	4	5	3	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Junction City	JUNCTION CITY, OR	53	3	4	5	Concerns
Avamere Rehabilitation of King City	TIGARD, OR	148	4	4	5	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Lebanon	LEBANON, OR	84	1	3	4	Concerns
Avamere Rehabilitation of Newport	NEWPORT, OR	52	4	5	4	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Oregon City	OREGON CITY, OR	111	2	4	4	Good
Avamere Riverpark of Eugene	EUGENE, OR	119	2	4	3	Good
Avamere Transitional Care at Sunnyside	SALEM, OR	88	2	3	4	Good
Avamere at Three Fountains	MEDFORD, OR	117	5	5	5	Good
Beaverton Post Acute Care of Cascadia	BEAVERTON, OR	104	5	5	3	Good
Bend Transitional Care	BEND, OR	60	5	5	5	Good
The Pearl at Kruse Way	LAKE OSWEGO, OR	74	5	5	3	Good
Avamere Olympic Rehabilitation of Sequim	SEQUIM, WA	90	1	4	4	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation at Park West	SEATTLE, WA	137	2	3	4	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation at Ridgemont	PORT ORCHARD, WA	96	4	3	4	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Burien	BURIEN, WA	140	2	4	3	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Cascade Park	VANCOUVER, WA	88	5	5	3	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Issaquah	ISSAQUAH, WA	140	2	2	4	Good
Avamere Rehabilitation of Shoreline	SEATTLE, WA	115	2	3	5	Good
Avamere Transitional Care of Puget Sound	TACOMA, WA	60	4	5	4	Good
Avamere at Pacific Ridge	TACOMA, WA	102	2	4	2	Good
Queen Anne Healthcare	SEATTLE, WA	120	5	5	3	Good
Richmond Beach Rehab	SHORELINE, WA	131	4	3	5	Good

Data Sources and Methodology

This analysis is based on the most recent data available from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). The data includes facility characteristics, quality ratings, staffing levels, and inspection results. Chain affiliations are determined based on the chain identification numbers provided by CMS.

Data Currency: Information was last updated on June 1, 2026. CMS updates this data monthly, and we refresh our analysis accordingly.

Methodology: Statistics are calculated across all facilities identified as belonging to this chain. Averages are facility-weighted, meaning each facility contributes equally to the chain averages regardless of size.