SKILLED NURSING OWNER & OPERATOR DATA
SKILLED VENTURE LLC
- Number of homes: 24
- Avg. Rating: 2.67:
- Deficiencies: 1,419
- Fines: $831,749
- States: 8
- Homes with Abuse Flag: 0
- Data date: May 01, 2026
SKILLED VENTURE LLC is involved with nursing homes in states: Florida, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, and Virginia.
The distribution of the CMS 5-Star Overall Ratings for SKILLED VENTURE LLC:
| Number of Stars | Count |
|---|---|
| 5: | 3 |
| 4: | 2 |
| 3: | 9 |
| 2: | 4 |
| 1: | 6 |
For AI Users, Agents, and Developers
Do you use a Generative AI assistant like ChatGPT or Claude or others? If so, you can point your assistant to our MCP server at https://mcp.nursinghomedatabase.com/mcp and have it do the searching for you. Ask your question and use our data to help you find the answers.
- Prefer scripts? Use a public REST API for JSON over HTTPS. Or set up MCP using our setup guide.
- Fair use applies; high-volume or commercial use may need a custom data arrangement.
Nursing Homes Affiliated with SKILLED VENTURE LLC
Table below shows each skilled nursing home that SKILLED VENTURE LLC is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.
NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.
| Skilled Nursing Facility | Description |
|---|---|
|
Aspen Hill Rehabiliation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 146 HAVERHILL, MA Ranking: #91 out of 109 (Ranking List) |
|
Bay Harbor Post Acute Healthcare Center Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 305 SALISBURY, MD Ranking: #14 out of 15 (Ranking List) |
|
Belmont Bay Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 120 WOODBRIDGE, VA Ranking: #47 out of 74 (Ranking List) |
|
Berlin Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 128 BERLIN, NJ Ranking: #49 out of 149 (Ranking List) |
|
Brockton Post Acute Care Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 169 BROCKTON, MA Ranking: #66 out of 174 (Ranking List) |
|
Cape Cod Post Acute Care Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 135 BREWSTER, MA Ranking: #9 out of 9 (Ranking List) |
|
Capitol Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 138 HARRISBURG, PA Ranking: #24 out of 46 (Ranking List) |
|
Cedar Crest Post Acute Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 166 ALLENTOWN, PA Ranking: #51 out of 79 (Ranking List) |
|
Collingswood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 160 ROCKVILLE, MD Ranking: #95 out of 130 (Ranking List) |
|
Hampden Post Acute Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 135 WILBRAHAM, MA Ranking: #7 out of 55 (Ranking List) |
|
Highland Park Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 195 CHELSEA, MA Ranking: #159 out of 178 (Ranking List) |
|
Heritage Hills Nursing and Rehabilitation Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 100 Smithfield, RI Ranking: #120 out of 126 (Ranking List) |
|
Lincolnwood Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 200 North Providence, RI Ranking: #114 out of 126 (Ranking List) |
|
Mill Brook Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 152 FALL RIVER, MA Ranking: #32 out of 102 (Ranking List) |
|
Nashua Post Acute Care Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 290 NASHUA, NH Ranking: #65 out of 109 (Ranking List) |
|
Riverside Post Acute Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 240 JACKSONVILLE, FL Ranking: #41 out of 51 (Ranking List) |
|
Roosevelt Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 240 PHILADELPHIA, PA Ranking: #183 out of 220 (Ranking List) |
|
Riverview Healthcare Community Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 190 Coventry, RI Ranking: #80 out of 103 (Ranking List) |
|
Southampton Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 195 RICHMOND, VA Ranking: #26 out of 39 (Ranking List) |
|
Tuckerman Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 41 NORTH BETHESDA, MD Ranking: #14 out of 142 (Ranking List) |
|
The Boulevard Post Acute Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 81 FAIRFAX, VA Ranking: #25 out of 108 (Ranking List) |
|
West Gables Health Care Center Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 120 MIAMI, FL Ranking: #11 out of 63 (Ranking List) |
|
Westmoreland Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 66 COLONIAL BEACH, VA Ranking: #7 out of 12 (Ranking List) |
|
Yardley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 170 YARDLEY, PA Ranking: #47 out of 195 (Ranking List) |
Skilled nursing homes with the red icon are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.
Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with SKILLED VENTURE LLC
Table below shows each skilled nursing home that SKILLED VENTURE LLC was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.
| Skilled Nursing Facility | Description |
|---|---|
|
Markley Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Most Recent Record: 01/01/2022 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 121 NORRISTOWN, PA Ranking: #163 out of 223 (Ranking List) |
|
Rittenhouse Post Acute Most Recent Record: 04/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 38 PHILADELPHIA, PA Ranking: #121 out of 240 (Ranking List) |
|
Northampton Post Acute Most Recent Record: 04/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 180 EASTON, PA Ranking: #32 out of 59 (Ranking List) |
|
Woodbine Rehabilitation and Healthcare Center Most Recent Record: 04/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 307 ALEXANDRIA, VA Ranking: #9 out of 108 (Ranking List) |
Skilled nursing homes with the red icon are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.
About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database
Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.
The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:
- 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
- DIRECTOR
- MANAGING EMPLOYEE
- OFFICER
- OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
- PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.