SKILLED NURSING OWNER & OPERATOR DATA
OAK INVESTMENT TRUST
- Number of homes: 17
- Avg. Rating: 4.47:
- Deficiencies: 486
- Fines: $390,652
- States: 12
- Homes with Abuse Flag: 0
- Data date: June 01, 2026
OAK INVESTMENT TRUST is involved with nursing homes in states: Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Illinois, Kansas, Michigan, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia, Washington, and Texas.
The distribution of the CMS 5-Star Overall Ratings for OAK INVESTMENT TRUST:
| Number of Stars | Count |
|---|---|
| 5: | 12 |
| 4: | 2 |
| 3: | 2 |
| 2: | 1 |
| 1: | 0 |
For AI Users, Agents, and Developers
Do you use a Generative AI assistant like ChatGPT or Claude or others? If so, you can point your assistant to our MCP server at https://mcp.nursinghomedatabase.com/mcp and have it do the searching for you. Ask your question and use our data to help you find the answers.
- Prefer scripts? Use a public REST API for JSON over HTTPS. Or set up MCP using our setup guide.
- Fair use applies; high-volume or commercial use may need a custom data arrangement.
Nursing Homes Affiliated with OAK INVESTMENT TRUST
Table below shows each skilled nursing home that OAK INVESTMENT TRUST is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.
NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.
| Skilled Nursing Facility | Description |
|---|---|
|
Ashby Ponds Inc Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 44 ASHBURN, VA Ranking: #17 out of 83 (Ranking List) |
|
Avalon Health Care Center at Stoneridge Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 40 MYSTIC, CT Ranking: #5 out of 39 (Ranking List) |
|
Briarwood at Timber Ridge Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 45 ISSAQUAH, WA Ranking: #8 out of 73 (Ranking List) |
|
Chatsworth at Pga National Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 62 PALM BEACH GARDENS, FL Ranking: #3 out of 40 (Ranking List) |
|
Continuing Care at Maris Grove Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 66 GLEN MILLS, PA Ranking: #42 out of 176 (Ranking List) |
|
Continuing Care at Eagles Trace Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 44 HOUSTON, TX Ranking: #21 out of 100 (Ranking List) |
|
Continuing Care at Highland Springs Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 44 DALLAS, TX Ranking: #102 out of 135 (Ranking List) |
|
Continuing Care at Lantern Hill Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 40 NEW PROVIDENCE, NJ Ranking: #180 out of 253 (Ranking List) |
|
Continuing Care at Wind Crest Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 44 HIGHLANDS RANCH, CO Ranking: #5 out of 84 (Ranking List) |
|
Essex Meadows Health Center Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 45 ESSEX, CT Ranking: #13 out of 65 (Ranking List) |
|
Fox Run Village Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 44 Novi, MI Ranking: #27 out of 136 (Ranking List) |
|
Oakton Place Health and Rehabilitation at The Arli Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 44 NAPLES, FL Ranking: #11 out of 13 (Ranking List) |
|
Pavilion at Brandon Wilde Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 65 EVANS, GA Ranking: #10 out of 24 (Ranking List) |
|
Radford Green Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 84 LINCOLNSHIRE, IL Ranking: #104 out of 201 (Ranking List) |
|
The Springs at Monarch Landing Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 96 NAPERVILLE, IL Ranking: #24 out of 202 (Ranking List) |
|
Tallgrass Creek, Inc Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 44 OVERLAND PARK, KS Ranking: #6 out of 102 (Ranking List) |
|
Waters Edge Health and Rehabilitation Role: indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 36 PALM CITY, FL Ranking: #1 out of 21 (Ranking List) |
Skilled nursing homes with the red icon are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.
Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with OAK INVESTMENT TRUST
Table below shows each skilled nursing home that OAK INVESTMENT TRUST was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.
| Skilled Nursing Facility | Description |
|---|---|
|
Acacia Health Center Most Recent Record: 04/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 78 PHOENIX, AZ Ranking: #3 out of 70 (Ranking List) |
|
Hale Ola Kino Most Recent Record: 08/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 32 HONOLULU, HI Ranking: #2 out of 27 (Ranking List) |
|
Terraces at The Clare Most Recent Record: 04/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 50 CHICAGO, IL Ranking: #44 out of 239 (Ranking List) |
|
Chestnut Grn Hlth Ctr Blakehur Most Recent Record: 04/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 49 TOWSON, MD Ranking: #20 out of 108 (Ranking List) |
|
The Birches at Trillium Woods Most Recent Record: 04/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 44 PLYMOUTH, MN Ranking: #7 out of 108 (Ranking List) |
|
The Arbor at Laurel Circle Most Recent Record: 04/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 64 BRIDGEWATER, NJ Ranking: #42 out of 166 (Ranking List) |
|
Casa De Las Campanas Most Recent Record: 04/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 99 SAN DIEGO, CA Ranking: #54 out of 72 (Ranking List) |
|
Arbol Healthcare Center of Santa Rosa Most Recent Record: 09/01/2025 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 45 SANTA ROSA, CA Ranking: #12 out of 24 (Ranking List) |
|
Parkwood Village Most Recent Record: 02/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 107 BEDFORD, TX Ranking: #9 out of 161 (Ranking List) |
|
Signature Pointe Most Recent Record: 02/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 195 Dallas, TX Ranking: #86 out of 148 (Ranking List) |
|
Walnut Place Most Recent Record: 01/01/2026 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 208 DALLAS, TX Ranking: #64 out of 150 (Ranking List) |
|
Autumn Leaves Most Recent Record: 11/01/2025 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 75 DALLAS, TX Ranking: #6 out of 143 (Ranking List) |
Skilled nursing homes with the red icon are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.
About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database
Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.
The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:
- 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
- DIRECTOR
- MANAGING EMPLOYEE
- OFFICER
- OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
- PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.