SKILLED NURSING OWNER & OPERATOR DATA
MOSHE ROSENBERG
- Number of homes: 7
- Avg. Rating: 2.14:
- Deficiencies: 371
- Fines: $448,046
- States: 4
- Homes with Abuse Flag: 1
- Data date: May 01, 2026
MOSHE ROSENBERG is involved with nursing homes in states: New Jersey, Ohio, Pennsylvania, and South Carolina.
The distribution of the CMS 5-Star Overall Ratings for MOSHE ROSENBERG:
| Number of Stars | Count |
|---|---|
| 5: | 0 |
| 4: | 1 |
| 3: | 0 |
| 2: | 5 |
| 1: | 1 |
For AI Users, Agents, and Developers
Do you use a Generative AI assistant like ChatGPT or Claude or others? If so, you can point your assistant to our MCP server at https://mcp.nursinghomedatabase.com/mcp and have it do the searching for you. Ask your question and use our data to help you find the answers.
- Prefer scripts? Use a public REST API for JSON over HTTPS. Or set up MCP using our setup guide.
- Fair use applies; high-volume or commercial use may need a custom data arrangement.
Nursing Homes Affiliated with MOSHE ROSENBERG
Table below shows each skilled nursing home that MOSHE ROSENBERG is associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid uses nine categories to indicate how owners and managers are affiliated with skilled nursing facilities: 5% Or Greater Direct Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Indirect Ownership Interest, 5% Or Greater Mortgage Interest, 5% Or Greater Security Interest, Director, Managing Employee, Officer, Operational/managerial Control, and Partnership Interest. These categories are shown in the table below.
NursingHomeDatabase offers data exports as Excel spreadsheets or APIs for companies or individuals that need ownership information for more than one facility. Prices vary; use the Data Request page to inquire.
| Skilled Nursing Facility | Description |
|---|---|
|
King David Post Acute Nursing and Rehabilitation LLC Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 355 BEACHWOOD, OH Ranking: #115 out of 148 (Ranking List) |
|
Majestic Center For Rehab and Sub-Acute Care Role: 5% or greater mortgage interest |
No. of Beds: 120 CAMDEN, NJ Ranking: #184 out of 224 (Ranking List) |
|
Runnells Center For Rehabilitation and Healthcare Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 300 BERKELEY HEIGHTS, NJ Ranking: #192 out of 232 (Ranking List) |
|
Resorts at Beaufort Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 170 Beaufort, SC Ranking: #8 out of 9 (Ranking List) |
|
St John Neumann Ctr For Rehab and Healthcare Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 226 PHILADELPHIA, PA Ranking: #153 out of 217 (Ranking List) |
|
St Monica Center For Rehabilitation and Healthcare Role: 5% or greater direct ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 180 PHILADELPHIA, PA Ranking: #131 out of 223 (Ranking List) |
|
Stroudsburg Post Acute Nursing and Rehabilitationllc Role: adp of the snf |
No. of Beds: 174 STROUDSBURG, PA Ranking: #35 out of 38 (Ranking List) |
Skilled nursing homes with the red icon are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.
Other Skilled Nursing Facilities Previously Associated with MOSHE ROSENBERG
Table below shows each skilled nursing home that MOSHE ROSENBERG was previously associated with, the nursing home's overall 5-star quality rating and provides a link to a comparison on the home to its local competition.
| Skilled Nursing Facility | Description |
|---|---|
|
Lincoln Park Renaissance Most Recent Record: 02/01/2024 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 189 LINCOLN PARK, NJ Ranking: #185 out of 304 (Ranking List) |
|
Lincoln Park Care Center Most Recent Record: 01/01/2024 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 547 LINCOLN PARK, NJ Ranking: #265 out of 305 (Ranking List) |
|
St Francis Center For Rehabilitation and Healthcare Most Recent Record: 11/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 273 DARBY, PA Ranking: #65 out of 233 (Ranking List) |
|
Immaculatemarycenter For Rehabilitation and healthcare Most Recent Record: 11/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 296 PHILADELPHIA, PA Ranking: #190 out of 217 (Ranking List) |
|
St Mary Center For Rehabilitation and Healthcare Most Recent Record: 11/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 120 LANSDALE, PA Ranking: #116 out of 210 (Ranking List) |
|
St Martha Center For Rehabilitation and Healthcare Most Recent Record: 11/01/2023 Role: 5% or greater indirect ownership interest |
No. of Beds: 120 DOWNINGTOWN, PA Ranking: #23 out of 121 (Ranking List) |
Skilled nursing homes with the red icon are homes where CMS had indicated that abuse has actually occurred or is likely to have occurred.
About the NursingHomeDatabase Skilled Nursing Owners Database
Our database of information about owners, managers, and directors of skilled nursing homes is based primarily on data provided by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid ("CMS"). CMS updates this information eleven times a year, typically at the end of each calendar month except for December. We pull the data as soon as it is available, run through a series of data checks and calculations and make the new data available right away.
The ownership data is typically just over 155,000 records covering over 45,000 individuals and companies that either own or are managing skilled nursing homes. The number of nursing homes in the NursingHomeDatabase skilled nursing home database is just over 15,000 which suggests that most homes will have more than one owner or operator and that many individuals and companies are involved with more than one nursing home. There are nine unique roles that are reported on:
- 5% OR GREATER DIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER INDIRECT OWNERSHIP INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER MORTGAGE INTEREST
- 5% OR GREATER SECURITY INTEREST
- DIRECTOR
- MANAGING EMPLOYEE
- OFFICER
- OPERATIONAL/MANAGERIAL CONTROL
- PARTNERSHIP INTEREST
The data is based upon records submitted to CMS by the individual nursing homes. There is often a lag time between the reporting of a change and its appearance in our database.