U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P in ARLINGTON, TX:
Reviews, Ratings, Surveys, Comparisons, Find a Doctor, etc.

Overall Rating:

Database data was released on January 25, 2023

About U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P

Rating:

NursingHomeDatabase has the latest reviews, location, phone numbers, list of medical professionaals and other information about U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P.

U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P is one of a type of hospitals called Acute Care Hospitals. It is located in ARLINGTON, TX. Its five star rating is 3. It's type of ownership is Physician. The facility's Medicare ID is 450872.

EMERGENCY SERVICES: It does provide emergency services.

There are 100 medical professionals affiliated with U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P.

According to a survey by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 72% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P, while only 9% did not recommend going to U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P.

The information presented below is based on data provided by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.

General Information for U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P

Address:

801 W INTERSTATE 20
ARLINGTON, TX 76017
(817) 472-3400
Click for Map

Medicare Provider Number:

450872

Type:

Acute Care Hospitals

Ownership:

Physician

Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P

Overall Rating:

The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.

Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.

The methodology used to calculate Overall Star Ratings involves multiple steps to select, standardize, and calculate scores based on Care Compare measures. Overall Star Ratings are created using this seven-step process:

  1. Selection and standardization of measures for inclusion in the Overall Star Rating
  2. Assignment of measures to groups
  3. Calculation and standardization of measure group scores
  4. Calculation of hospital summary scores as a weighted average of available group scores
  5. Application of minimum thresholds for receiving an Overall Star Rating
  6. Assignment of hospitals to peer groups based on their number of measure groups (3, 4, or 5)
  7. Application of clustering algorithm to categorize summary scores into star ratings

For each hospital, a hospital summary score is calculated by taking the weighted average of the hospital’s scores for each measure group. The table below shows the weight applied to each measure group. The hospital summary score is then used to assign hospitals to star ratings, using k-means clustering within each peer group.

Measure group Weight used in calculation
Mortality 22%
Safety 22%
Readmission 22%
Patient Experience 22%
Timely & Effective Care 12%

Note that these percentage weights are out of 100%. If a hospital has no measures in a certain measure group, the weighted percentage is redistributed proportionally to the other measure groups. For example, if a hospital had no measures in the Timely & Effective Care category, the 12% weight would be redistributed evenly as 25% for each of the Mortality, Safety of Care, Readmission and Patient Experience groups.

National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.

Overall rating Number of hospitals / Percentage
1 star 198 (6.34%)
2 stars 702 (22.49%)
3 stars 895 (28.68%)
4 stars 895 (28.68%)
5 stars 431 (13.81%)
N/A 1,368 (30.47%)

Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.

Cost of U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P, Compare to National and State Averages

Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P provides.

To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.

MSPB for U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P: 93.11%

On average at U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P, emergency patients were changed $23,530. This is lower than the state average of $26,387. It is also lower than the state average of $24,355.

More Information about the calculation of Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary for U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P: The measure assesses Medicare Part A and Part B payments for services provided to a U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P during a spending-per-beneficiary episode that spans from three days prior to an inpatient hospital admission through 30 days after discharge. The payments included in this measure are price-standardized and risk-adjusted. The payment measures for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement are estimates of payments associated with a 30-day episode of care for heart attack, heart failure, or pneumonia, or a 90-day episode of care for hip/knee replacement. The episode of care begins with the admission. For the heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia measures, payments across multiple care settings, services, and supplies (inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, home health, hospice, physician/clinical laboratory/ambulance services, durable medical equipment, prosthetics/orthotics, and supplies) are assessed for the next 30 days. For hip/knee replacement, the measure includes all payments for the next 30 days but also includes payments related to the hip/knee replacement for days 31 – 90. For the heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement payment measures, payment rates are provided in the downloadable database and presented on the Hospital Care Compare website in terms of dollars. Hospitals’ rates are compared to the national mean payment to categorize whether a hospital’s payment rate is less than the national mean payment, no different than the national mean payment, or greater than the national mean payment, For some hospitals, the number of cases is too small to reliably compare their results to the national mean payment. The payment measures are not intended to be interpreted in isolation but to be considered in the context of existing quality measures such as CMS’s 30-day mortality measures for heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia, and the 90-day complication measure for hip/knee replacement.

Detailed table for spending and period for patients at U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P:

Type Amount
Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $22
Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $38
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $2
Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) $546
Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $15,552
Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) $0
Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) $18
Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) $2,746
Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $440
Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $0
Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $2,280
Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $307
Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $197
Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $172
Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) $1,210
Total (Complete Episode) $23,530

Infection Rates at U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P

These measures show how often patients at U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally. HAI measures provide information on infections that occur while the patient is in the hospital and include: central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), catheterassociated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), surgical site infection (SSI) from colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) blood laboratory-identified events (bloodstream infections), and Clostridium difficile (C.diff.) laboratory-identified events (intestinal infections). The HAI measures show how often patients at U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to like hospitals. The CDC calculates a Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) which may take into account the type of patient care location, number of patients with an existing infection, laboratory methods, hospital affiliation with a medical school, bed size of the hospital, patient age, and classification of patient health. SIRs are calculated for the hospital, the state, and the nation. Hospitals’ SIRs are compared to the national benchmark to determine if hospitals’ performance on these measures is better than the national benchmark (lower), no different than the national benchmark, or worse than the national benchmark (higher). The HAI measures apply to all patients treated in acute care hospitals, including adult, pediatric, neonatal, Medicare, and non-Medicare patients.

Infection Type Score / Compare to National Average
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days 984.00 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.59 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days 1,435.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases 0.77 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures 20.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases 0.54 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases 0.00 / Not Available
SSI - Colon Surgery Not Available / Not Available
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit -- / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit 1.33 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures 292.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases 2.25 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases 0.00 / Same
SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy 0.00 / Same
MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit Not Available / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days 3,946.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases 0.09 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases 1.00 / Not Available
MRSA Bacteremia Not Available / Not Available
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit -- / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit 2.68 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days 3,946.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases 1.12 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases 0.00 / Same
Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) 0.00 / Same

How U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P Compares to Other Similar Facilities

This is how U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.

Top Hospitals in ARLINGTON, TX

Worst Hospitals in ARLINGTON, TX

Percentages of Complications and Deaths at U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P

Measure Score Compared to National Rates
Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients 2.6% SAME
Death rate for heart attack patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for CABG surgery patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for COPD patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for heart failure patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for pneumonia patients NA Not Enough Data
Death rate for stroke patients NA Not Enough Data
Pressure ulcer rate 0.44% SAME
Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications NA Not Enough Data
Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate 0.18% SAME
In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate 0.07% SAME
Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate 2.3% SAME
Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate 0.86% SAME
Postoperative respiratory failure rate 3.86% SAME
Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate 3.16% SAME
Postoperative sepsis rate 4.6% SAME
Postoperative wound dehiscence rate 0.75% SAME
Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate 0.95% SAME
CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite 0.92% SAME

Medical Professsionals Affiliated with U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P

These are the doctors affliated with this hospital:

  • MARYANN ABANOBI ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • ARIFA ABID ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - LONESTAR HOSPITAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES PA )
  • OLUFEMI ABIODUN ( GASTROENTEROLOGY - LAS CRUCES PHYSICIAN SERVICES LLC )
  • MOHAMMAD ALAM ( FAMILY PRACTICE - LONESTAR HOSPITAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES PA )
  • AARON AMOS ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • REVATHI ANGITAPALLI ( HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY - ONCOLOGY-HEMATOLOGY CONSULTANTS PA )
  • NIRAJ BADHIWALA ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • EMMET BALCH ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - SINGLETON ASSOCIATES PA )
  • GARGEYI BANDARU ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - LONESTAR HOSPITAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES PA )
  • VAISHALI BHUSARI ( FAMILY PRACTICE - LONESTAR HOSPITAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES PA )
  • ELVA BIAN ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • CHRISTOPHER BLEDSOE ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • BENJAMIN BOWERS ( GENERAL SURGERY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • JEFFRY BRACE ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - SINGLETON ASSOCIATES PA )
  • WILLIAM BURRIS ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • LYNDON BUSCH ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • TRACY CANNON-SMITH ( UROLOGY - UROLOGY PARTNERS OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • JOSEPH CARUSO ( VASCULAR SURGERY - PRMC HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC. )
  • STEPHEN CHALMERS ( NEPHROLOGY - NORTH TEXAS NEPHROLOGY ASSOCIATES PA )
  • ERIC CHAPPELL ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • GINA CONSTANTINE ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • SUMMER DAMUTH ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TEXAS MEDICINE RESOURCES, LLP )
  • DEVAK DESAI ( INFECTIOUS DISEASE - ID PARTNERS PA )
  • ANIL DESAI ( INTERNAL MEDICINE )
  • SHYLASHREE EDALUR ( PATHOLOGY - AMERIPATH LUBBOCK 501A CORPORATION )
  • JENNIFER FELTMAN ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TEXAS MEDICINE RESOURCES, LLP )
  • LLOYD FOSTER ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • HOYT FRENZEL ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TEXAS MEDICINE RESOURCES, LLP )
  • NATALIA GOODWIN ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • PHILLIP GUERRA ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • HEATHER HAVENER ( OBSTETRICS/GYNECOLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • EDWARD HEYNE ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • JAMES HOLLIDAY ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • STEVEN HYBARGER ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • SAFA JASSIM ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • ERIC JENKINS ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - PAIN MANAGEMENT PHYSICIANS OF DALLAS PLLC )
  • KORY JONES ( GENERAL SURGERY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • HAMID KAMRAN ( GASTROENTEROLOGY )
  • PETER LANASA ( RADIATION ONCOLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • PAIGE LATHAM ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • KIMBERLY LAVENDER ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • JUSTIN LEE ( UROLOGY - UROLOGY PARTNERS OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • JEFFREY LEITKO ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - SINGLETON ASSOCIATES PA )
  • CYNTHIA LONG ( INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY - SINGLETON ASSOCIATES PA )
  • ANN LOPEZ ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TEXAS MEDICINE RESOURCES, LLP )
  • BRADLEY LYMAN ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • AUGUSTUS LYONS ( GENERAL SURGERY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • GREGORY MATHIOS ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CHISHOLM TRAIL URGENT CARE PLLC )
  • JOEY MAYOR ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - CONCORD MEDICAL GROUP OF TEXAS PLLC )
  • KATHRYN MCCRADY ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • MARK MCCURDY ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • STEPHEN MELLER ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • JOHN MILLER ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • ADAM MILLER ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TEXAS MEDICINE RESOURCES, LLP )
  • SOBIA NABEEL ( HEMATOLOGY/ONCOLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • ALIA NASSIF ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • LESLIE NELSON ( INTERNAL MEDICINE )
  • DAI NGUYEN ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TEXAS MEDICINE RESOURCES, LLP )
  • JAMIE NGUYEN ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • LONG NGUYEN ( GENERAL SURGERY - NORTH TEXAS SURGICAL SPECIALISTS PLLC )
  • GEOFFREY NUSS ( UROLOGY - UROLOGY PARTNERS OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • AYODELE OSOWO ( GASTROENTEROLOGY - LAS CRUCES PHYSICIAN SERVICES LLC )
  • DANTE PARAS ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • ROBERT PARHAM ( UROLOGY - COOKEVILLE REGIONAL MEDICAL GROUP INC )
  • STEPHEN PENCA ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • JOHN PUMPHREY ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • SAQIB RAZAQ ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TEXAS MEDICINE RESOURCES, LLP )
  • RAGHURAM REDDY ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - SINGLETON ASSOCIATES PA )
  • GRANT REDROW ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • COURTNEY ROBERTS ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • ELIZABETH ROBERTS ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ ( ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY - ARLINGTON ORTHOPEDIC ASSOCIATES PA )
  • ADELLE SAFO ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • MIGDALIA SALOUM ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • PARTH SHAH ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • DAVID SHEPHERD ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • JAMES SMITH ( PATHOLOGY - AMERIPATH LUBBOCK 501A CORPORATION )
  • DEEPIKA SOLOMON ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • CHRISTOPHER SPIKES ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • RATTAPOL SRISINROONGRUANG ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - EMCARE RSN EMERGENCY PHYSICIANS PLLC )
  • CHRISTINA STALLWORTH ( PATHOLOGY - AMERIPATH LUBBOCK 501A CORPORATION )
  • JACOB STETLER ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • SUSAN STRATEN ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - SINGLETON ASSOCIATES PA )
  • ANDREW SUN ( UROLOGY - UROLOGY PARTNERS OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • PHENG TANG ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • DOMINIC TANG ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • LEI TIAN ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )
  • JOHN TIU ( PULMONARY DISEASE - TEXAS PULMONARY AND CRITICAL CARE CONSULTANTS PA )
  • FREDERICK TODD ( NEUROSURGERY )
  • THOMAS TRUELSON ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • FATEMA UDDIN ( GASTROENTEROLOGY - UNIVERSITY HEALTH SYSTEM, INC. )
  • STEVEN VIGNALE ( INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY - HEARTPLACE PA )
  • INAYATULLAH WAHDATYAR ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - LONESTAR HOSPITAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES PA )
  • JULIA WILLINGHAM ( UROLOGY - MEDICAL CLINIC OF NORTH TEXAS, PLLC )
  • JOHN WORRELL ( PATHOLOGY - AMERIPATH LUBBOCK 501A CORPORATION )
  • JAMES WRIGHT ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - TEXAS MEDICINE RESOURCES, LLP )
  • RALPH WYNN ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - SINGLETON ASSOCIATES PA )
  • HANI YOUSIF ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - LONESTAR HOSPITAL MEDICINE ASSOCIATES PA )
  • SUNBAL ZAFAR ( GASTROENTEROLOGY - GASTROENTEROLOGY PRACTICE ASSOCIATES, PLLC )
  • NEIL ZUCKER ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - U S ANESTHESIA PARTNERS OF TEXAS, PA )

Patient Survey Results

Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for U S M D HOSPITAL AT ARLINGTON L P to the national results for similar facilities.

Survey Question Response
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well 74 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 6 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well 20 %
Nurse communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Nurse communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 78 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 4 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 18 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them 71 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 5 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them 24 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 72 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 10 %
Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 18 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well 81 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well 13 %
Doctor communication - linear mean score Not Applicable
Doctor communication - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect 85 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect 5 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them 83 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them 7 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them 10 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand 76 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand 6 %
Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand 18 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted 73 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted 8 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted 19 %
Staff responsiveness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Staff responsiveness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 73 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 10 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted 17 %
Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 72 %
Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 6 %
Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted 22 %
Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them 59 %
Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them 25 %
Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them 16 %
Communication about medicines - linear mean score Not Applicable
Communication about medicines - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for 75 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for 9 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. 16 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects 43 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects 41 %
Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects 16 %
Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home 25 %
Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home 75 %
Discharge information - linear mean score Not Applicable
Discharge information - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge 27 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge 73 %
Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 22 %
Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge 78 %
Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 38 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital 52 %
Care transition - linear mean score Not Applicable
Care transition - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 39 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 14 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs 47 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 40 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 10 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health 50 %
Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 35 %
Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 6 %
Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital 59 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean 81 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean 9 %
Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean 10 %
Cleanliness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Cleanliness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night 79 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night 2 %
Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night 19 %
Quietness - linear mean score Not Applicable
Quietness - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 10 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 18 %
Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) 72 %
Overall hospital rating - linear mean score Not Applicable
Overall hospital rating - star rating Not Applicable
Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital 9 %
Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital 72 %
Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital 19 %
Recommend hospital - linear mean score Not Applicable
Recommend hospital - star rating Not Applicable
Summary star rating Not Applicable