MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER in SIOUX CITY, IA:
Reviews, Ratings, Surveys, Comparisons, Find a Doctor, etc.
Overall Rating:
Database data was released on July 27, 2022
About MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER
Rating:
MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER is one of a type of hospital called Acute Care Hospitals located in SIOUX CITY, IA. It does provide emergency services. Its five star rating is 2. It's type of ownership is Voluntary non-profit - Private. The facility's Medicare ID is 160153.
There are 113 medical professionals affiliated with MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER.
According to a survey by the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems ("HCAHPS") that ended in September 30, 2021, 56% of the patients surveyed definitely recommended MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER, while only 10% did not recommend going to MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER.
The information presented below is based on data provide by U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). It is updated as new data is made available.
General Information for MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER
Address:
801 5TH ST
SIOUX CITY, IA
51101
Click for Map
Medicare Provider Number:
160153
Type:
Acute Care Hospitals
Ownership:
Voluntary non-profit - Private
Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER
Overall Rating:
The Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating for MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER summarizes a variety of measures across 5 areas of quality into a single star rating for each hospital. Once reporting thresholds are met, a hospital’s Overall Star Rating is calculated using only those measures for which data are available. Hospitals report data to The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services ("CMS") through the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program, Hospital Outpatient Quality Reporting (OQR) Program, Hospital Readmission Reduction Program (HRRP), Hospital-Acquired Condition (HAC) Reduction Program, and Hospital Value-Based Purchasing (VBP) Program. Overall Star Ratings aren’t calculated for Veterans Health Administration (VHA) or Department of Defense (DoD) hospitals.
Most hospitals will have an Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating of 3.
The methodology used to calculate Overall Star Ratings involves multiple steps to select, standardize, and calculate scores based on Care Compare measures. Overall Star Ratings are created using this seven-step process:
- Selection and standardization of measures for inclusion in the Overall Star Rating
- Assignment of measures to groups
- Calculation and standardization of measure group scores
- Calculation of hospital summary scores as a weighted average of available group scores
- Application of minimum thresholds for receiving an Overall Star Rating
- Assignment of hospitals to peer groups based on their number of measure groups (3, 4, or 5)
- Application of clustering algorithm to categorize summary scores into star ratings
For each hospital, a hospital summary score is calculated by taking the weighted average of the hospital’s scores for each measure group. The table below shows the weight applied to each measure group. The hospital summary score is then used to assign hospitals to star ratings, using k-means clustering within each peer group.
| Measure group | Weight used in calculation |
|---|---|
| Mortality | 22% |
| Safety | 22% |
| Readmission | 22% |
| Patient Experience | 22% |
| Timely & Effective Care | 12% |
Note that these percentage weights are out of 100%. If a hospital has no measures in a certain measure group, the weighted percentage is redistributed proportionally to the other measure groups. For example, if a hospital had no measures in the Timely & Effective Care category, the 12% weight would be redistributed evenly as 25% for each of the Mortality, Safety of Care, Readmission and Patient Experience groups.
National distribution of the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating The following table shows the national distribution of the Overall Star Rating based on July 2022 results.
| Overall rating | Number of hospitals / Percentage |
|---|---|
| 1 star | 198 (6.34%) |
| 2 stars | 702 (22.49%) |
| 3 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 4 stars | 895 (28.68%) |
| 5 stars | 431 (13.81%) |
| N/A | 1,368 (30.47%) |
Additional detailed on the method for calculating the Overall Hospital Quality Star Rating from this document.
Cost of MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER, Compare to National and State Averages
Understanding how much a hospital is going to cost is extremely difficult. Hospitals themselves actively obscure what they charge and have negotiated different rates with different insurers. Then you have the problem of the wide variety of treatments which the MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER provides.
To provide some standard metric to compare hospital costs, CMS publishes the MSPB (or "Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary"). Even though you may not be on Medicare, this metric may still be useful. The MSPB is expressed as a percentage compared to the national average for costs that Medicare incurs. A percentage higher than 100% means the hospital charges more than the national average while a percentage less than 100% means the hospital charges less than the national average.
MSPB for MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER: 99.96%
On average at MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER, emergency patients were changed $22,336. This is higher than the state average of $22,105. It is also lower than the state average of $22,537.
More Information about the calculation of Medicare Spending Per Beneficiary for MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER: The measure assesses Medicare Part A and Part B payments for services provided to a MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER during a spending-per-beneficiary episode that spans from three days prior to an inpatient hospital admission through 30 days after discharge. The payments included in this measure are price-standardized and risk-adjusted. The payment measures for heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement are estimates of payments associated with a 30-day episode of care for heart attack, heart failure, or pneumonia, or a 90-day episode of care for hip/knee replacement. The episode of care begins with the admission. For the heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia measures, payments across multiple care settings, services, and supplies (inpatient, outpatient, skilled nursing facility, home health, hospice, physician/clinical laboratory/ambulance services, durable medical equipment, prosthetics/orthotics, and supplies) are assessed for the next 30 days. For hip/knee replacement, the measure includes all payments for the next 30 days but also includes payments related to the hip/knee replacement for days 31 – 90. For the heart attack, heart failure, pneumonia, and hip/knee replacement payment measures, payment rates are provided in the downloadable database and presented on the Hospital Care Compare website in terms of dollars. Hospitals’ rates are compared to the national mean payment to categorize whether a hospital’s payment rate is less than the national mean payment, no different than the national mean payment, or greater than the national mean payment, For some hospitals, the number of cases is too small to reliably compare their results to the national mean payment. The payment measures are not intended to be interpreted in isolation but to be considered in the context of existing quality measures such as CMS’s 30-day mortality measures for heart attack, heart failure, and pneumonia, and the 90-day complication measure for hip/knee replacement.
Detailed table for spending and period for patients at MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER:
| Type | Amount |
|---|---|
| Home Health Agency (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Hospice (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Outpatient (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $298 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $19 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $11 |
| Carrier (1 to 3 days Prior to Index Hospital Admission) | $636 |
| Home Health Agency (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Hospice (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Inpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $11,281 |
| Outpatient (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (During Index Hospital Admission) | $0 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (During Index Hospital Admission) | $8 |
| Carrier (During Index Hospital Admission) | $1,546 |
| Home Health Agency (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $471 |
| Hospice (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $53 |
| Inpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $3,126 |
| Outpatient (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $949 |
| Skilled Nursing Facility (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $2,711 |
| Durable Medical Equipment (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $82 |
| Carrier (1 through 30 days After Discharge from Index Hospital Admission) | $1,142 |
| Total (Complete Episode) | $22,336 |
Infection Rates at MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER
These measures show how often patients at MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to other hospitals nationally. HAI measures provide information on infections that occur while the patient is in the hospital and include: central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI), catheterassociated urinary tract infections (CAUTI), surgical site infection (SSI) from colon surgery or abdominal hysterectomy, methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus Aureus (MRSA) blood laboratory-identified events (bloodstream infections), and Clostridium difficile (C.diff.) laboratory-identified events (intestinal infections). The HAI measures show how often patients at MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER contract certain infections during the course of their medical treatment, when compared to like hospitals. The CDC calculates a Standardized Infection Ratio (SIR) which may take into account the type of patient care location, number of patients with an existing infection, laboratory methods, hospital affiliation with a medical school, bed size of the hospital, patient age, and classification of patient health. SIRs are calculated for the hospital, the state, and the nation. Hospitals’ SIRs are compared to the national benchmark to determine if hospitals’ performance on these measures is better than the national benchmark (lower), no different than the national benchmark, or worse than the national benchmark (higher). The HAI measures apply to all patients treated in acute care hospitals, including adult, pediatric, neonatal, Medicare, and non-Medicare patients.
| Infection Type | Score / Compare to National Average |
|---|---|
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 2.39 / Worse |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 6.42 / Worse |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection: Number of Device Days | 4,209.00 / Worse |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 3.96 / Worse |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 16.00 / Worse |
| Central Line Associated Bloodstream Infection (ICU + select Wards) | 4.04 / Worse |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.06 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.08 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Number of Urinary Catheter Days | 5,953.00 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Predicted Cases | 6.14 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards): Observed Cases | 2.00 / Same |
| Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infections (ICU + select Wards) | 0.33 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Lower Confidence Limit | -- / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Upper Confidence Limit | 1.43 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Number of Procedures | 75.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Predicted Cases | 2.09 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Same |
| SSI - Colon Surgery | 0.00 / Same |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Lower Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Upper Confidence Limit | Not Available / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Number of Procedures | 61.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Predicted Cases | 0.51 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy: Observed Cases | 0.00 / Not Available |
| SSI - Abdominal Hysterectomy | Not Available / Not Available |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Lower Confidence Limit | 0.99 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Upper Confidence Limit | 4.48 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Patient Days | 37,990.00 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Predicted Cases | 3.09 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia: Observed Cases | 7.00 / Same |
| MRSA Bacteremia | 2.27 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Lower Confidence Limit | 0.64 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Upper Confidence Limit | 1.67 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Patient Days | 37,990.00 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Predicted Cases | 15.98 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff): Observed Cases | 17.00 / Same |
| Clostridium Difficile (C.Diff) | 1.06 / Same |
How MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER Compares to Other Similar Facilities
This is how MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER compares to other similar hospitals nationally based on data provided to CMS.
Top Hospitals in SIOUX CITY, IA
Worst Hospitals in SIOUX CITY, IA
Percentages of Complications and Deaths at MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER
| Measure | Score | Compared to National Rates |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications for hip/knee replacement patients | 2.5% | SAME |
| Death rate for heart attack patients | 15.9% | Worse |
| Death rate for CABG surgery patients | 3.8% | SAME |
| Death rate for COPD patients | 9.5% | SAME |
| Death rate for heart failure patients | 14.7% | Worse |
| Death rate for pneumonia patients | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate for stroke patients | 13.3% | SAME |
| Pressure ulcer rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Death rate among surgical inpatients with serious treatable complications | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Iatrogenic pneumothorax rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| In-hospital fall with hip fracture rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Perioperative hemorrhage or hematoma rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative acute kidney injury requiring dialysis rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative respiratory failure rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Perioperative pulmonary embolism or deep vein thrombosis rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative sepsis rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Postoperative wound dehiscence rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| Abdominopelvic accidental puncture or laceration rate | NA | Not Enough Data |
| CMS Medicare PSI 90: Patient safety and adverse events composite | NA | Not Enough Data |
Skilled Nursing Facilities Near MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER
Many hospital patients are not ready to return home after a hospital visit. If recovery is going to be protracted, doctors will often advise that the patients recuperate at a skilled nursing facility. Below is a list of the skilled nursing homes near MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER ranked by their CMS 5-Star Overall Rating.
Medical Professsionals Affiliated with MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER
These are the doctors affliated with this hospital:
- KEVIN PRESTON ( INTERNAL MEDICINE )
- SANDRA SHUMAKER ( NURSE PRACTITIONER )
- JAMES ROAT ( GASTROENTEROLOGY )
- OTIS APAU ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- GARY CHAN ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- TARA LIDDIARD ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - SIOUXLAND UROLOGY ASSOCIATES PC )
- LUKAS SACHAU ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - SIOUXLAND UROLOGY ASSOCIATES PC )
- SARAH BREND ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - SIOUXLAND UROLOGY ASSOCIATES PC )
- DANIEL WINGARD ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS OF TEXAS I, PA )
- GLENN GOODHART ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- RYAN FARRER ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - GRAYS HARBOR COMMUNITY HOSPITAL )
- KHAM UNG ( PODIATRY - FOOT AND ANKLE CLINIC PC )
- ALEX SCHROEDER ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- THOMAS BROCKHAUS ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- RICHARD VAUGHT ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- JESSE SCOTT ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- JOSEPH COSTA ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- STACEY TODD ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - ST ANTHONY REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND NURSING HOME )
- ROBERT DIEGO ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- RITA HOGUE ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- DORIA CIANNELLI ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- ANN BERENS ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- JOHN HAGESTROM ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- AUSTIN FERGUSON ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- DAVID CLARK ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- ABBIE OSTRIHONSKY ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- CRAIG BERGH ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - ST ANTHONY REGIONAL HOSPITAL AND NURSING HOME )
- AMANDA BAINBRIDGE ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- IGOR BEGOVIC ( ANESTHESIOLOGY - NORTH IOWA MERCY CLINICS )
- KATHLEEN BERGER ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- KIMBERLY PERRY ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- KELLY HAUCK ( CERTIFIED REGISTERED NURSE ANESTHETIST (CRNA) - MHC ANESTHESIA SERVICES )
- MICHAELA WHEATLEY ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- KELLY HEIDEPRIEM ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - WOODBURY EMERGENCY GROUP, PC )
- MICHAEL QUINLIVAN ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - WOODBURY EMERGENCY GROUP, PC )
- STEVEN WARRINGTON ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - WOODBURY EMERGENCY GROUP, PC )
- SUMAN TANDRA ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - WOODBURY EMERGENCY GROUP, PC )
- ZEAN CHEN ( EMERGENCY MEDICINE - WOODBURY EMERGENCY GROUP, PC )
- MITCHEL BAUMAN ( PATHOLOGY - SIOUXLAND DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY SERVICES PLLC )
- WARDA IBRAR ( PATHOLOGY - SIOUXLAND DIAGNOSTIC PATHOLOGY SERVICES PLLC )
- SALMAN MEHBOOB ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) - COASTAL CARDIOVASCULAR CARE INC )
- SYED ALI ( NEPHROLOGY - NUVIEW TELEHEALTH LLC )
- MOHAMMAD EL BABA ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- FAYE WINDER ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - FAITH REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES )
- JOSHUA HOCKETT ( ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY - CNOS PC )
- ELIZABETH FRANK ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - CNOS PC )
- DANIEL KENSINGER ( ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY - CNOS PC )
- ANNE JENEARY ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - CNOS PC )
- NEAL KHURANA ( INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY - VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY OF SIOUXLAND )
- CHAD LAURICH ( VASCULAR SURGERY - VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY OF SIOUXLAND )
- DONALD BROWN ( VASCULAR SURGERY - VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY OF SIOUXLAND )
- MIR SUBLA ( INTERVENTIONAL CARDIOLOGY - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- REBECCA ASKEA ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - VIRTUAL RADIOLOGIC PROFESSIONALS LLC )
- JOHN HEFFRON ( FAMILY PRACTICE - OMAHA TRIBE OF NEBRASKA )
- DANIEL NJINGEH ( HOSPITALIST - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- BRANDON VANHESSCHE ( PSYCHIATRY - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- DANIELA FERRELL ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- KIRSTEN NEDVED ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- DAVID ENSZ ( FAMILY PRACTICE - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- GLYNNE EDWARDS ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- MELISSA ROBERTS ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- KENDRA HAMMOND ( CRITICAL CARE (INTENSIVISTS) - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- JAMES RUSCH ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- LOIS PIROZEK ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - FAMILY HEALTH CARE OF SIOUXLAND PLC )
- STEVEN JOYCE ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- JESSICA WINELAND ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MIDLANDS CLINIC PC )
- DORI SEVDE ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- STEPHANIE CARTER ( CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE (CARDIOLOGY) - COASTAL CARDIOVASCULAR CARE INC )
- JENNIFER LUCART ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- SARA KARPUK ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - FAMILY HEALTH CARE OF SIOUXLAND PLC )
- LARRY SELLERS ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- LOSTY TORRES POTTER ( ENDOCRINOLOGY - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- TRACEY PICK ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- GREGORY HALBUR ( FAMILY PRACTICE - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- ADNAN QALBANI ( DIAGNOSTIC RADIOLOGY - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- DANIEL LAMPTEY ( INFECTIOUS DISEASE - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- KAYLA FOLSOM ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- AMY LYNDE ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- DAVID DANIELS ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - IOWA PHYSICIANS CLINIC MEDICAL FOUNDATION )
- REBECCA MATTAS ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- MICHAEL GARRETT ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- CURTIS HOOGENDOORN ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- GIOVANNI CIUFFO ( THORACIC SURGERY - MERCY MEDICAL SERVICES )
- DANIEL MOORE ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- TERESA CROFT ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- AMANDA ANDERSON ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - VASCULAR AND INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY OF SIOUXLAND )
- RICHARD ANDERSEN ( FAMILY PRACTICE - FAMILY HEALTH CARE OF SIOUXLAND PLC )
- LINDSEY SCHUTTE ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - FAMILY HEALTH CARE OF SIOUXLAND PLC )
- ASHAR LUQMAN ( NEPHROLOGY - LIEM SOM OEI MD PC )
- JEROLD ERLANDSON ( NEPHROLOGY - LIEM SOM OEI MD PC )
- MARK DAVIS ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- NEHA MEHTA ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- RACHEAL FOLKERS ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- AMANDA HOGAN ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- PATRICE MUHAMMAD ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- QASIM MAHBOOB ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- JOHN ERVIN ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- URSULA PANDIT ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- NOEL DELEON ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- KRISTINE DANNER ( FAMILY PRACTICE - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- JEFF DITTER ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- SUNITA TIMILSINA ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- THERESA CONLON ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- JESSICA ENGLISH ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- DHRUBA KANDEL ( INTERNAL MEDICINE - WOODBURY PHYSICIAN SERVICES, PC )
- LORI DREA ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - MIDLANDS CLINIC PC )
- LAWRENCE VOLZ ( GENERAL SURGERY - MIDLANDS CLINIC PC )
- PAUL JOHNSON ( GENERAL SURGERY - MIDLANDS CLINIC PC )
- WILLIAM RIZK ( GENERAL SURGERY - MIDLANDS CLINIC PC )
- BRENDA VAN SCOYK ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - MIDLANDS CLINIC PC )
- JEFFREY MICHALAK ( GASTROENTEROLOGY - MIDLANDS CLINIC PC )
- MARY MCGOWAN ( NURSE PRACTITIONER - SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER )
- MOLLY EARLEYWINE ( PHYSICIAN ASSISTANT - SIOUXLAND COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER )
Patient Survey Results
Below is information compiled by CMS on the percentage of patients who respond to specific treatments and a comparison of the results for MERCYONE SIOUXLAND MEDICAL CENTER to the national results for similar facilities.
| Survey Question | Response |
|---|---|
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" communicated well | 70 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 7 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" communicated well | 23 % |
| Nurse communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Nurse communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 79 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 4 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" listened carefully to them | 67 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" listened carefully to them | 25 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 64 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 9 % |
| Patients who reported that their nurses "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 27 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" communicated well | 70 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated well | 8 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" communicated well | 22 % |
| Doctor communication - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Doctor communication - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" treated them with courtesy and respect | 78 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" treated them with courtesy and respect | 5 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" treated them with courtesy and respect | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" listened carefully to them | 68 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" listened carefully to them | 9 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" listened carefully to them | 23 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Always" explained things in a way they could understand | 64 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Sometimes" or "Never" explained things in a way they could understand | 10 % |
| Patients who reported that their doctors "Usually" explained things in a way they could understand | 26 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help as soon as they wanted | 49 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help as soon as they wanted | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help as soon as they wanted | 34 % |
| Staff responsiveness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Staff responsiveness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 46 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received help after using the call button as soon as they wanted | 37 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Always" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 52 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Sometimes" or "Never" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 16 % |
| Patients who reported that they "Usually" received bathroom help as soon as they wanted | 32 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Always" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 47 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Sometimes" or "Never" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 28 % |
| Patients who reported that staff "Usually" explained about medicines before giving it to them | 25 % |
| Communication about medicines - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Communication about medicines - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" communicated what the medication was for | 60 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" communicated what the medication was for | 16 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" communicated what the medication was for. | 24 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Always" discussed possible side effects | 34 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Sometimes" or "Never" discussed possible side effects | 40 % |
| Patients who reported that when receiving new medication the staff "Usually" discussed possible side effects | 26 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they were not given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they were given information about what to do during their recovery at home | 82 % |
| Discharge information - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Discharge information - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 18 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did discuss whether they would need help after discharge | 82 % |
| Patients who reported that NO, they did not receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 17 % |
| Patients who reported that YES, they did receive written information about possible symptoms to look out for after discharge | 83 % |
| Patients who "Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 51 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 8 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" they understood their care when they left the hospital | 41 % |
| Care transition - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Care transition - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who "Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 56 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 9 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that the staff took my preferences into account when determining my health care needs | 35 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 51 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 8 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood their responsiblities in managing their health | 41 % |
| Patients who "Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 44 % |
| Patients who "Disagree" or "Strongly Disagree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 8 % |
| Patients who "Strongly Agree" that they understood the purposes of their medications when leaving the hospital | 48 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Always" clean | 65 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Sometimes" or "Never" clean | 13 % |
| Patients who reported that their room and bathroom were "Usually" clean | 22 % |
| Cleanliness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Cleanliness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Always" quiet at night | 53 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Sometimes" or "Never" quiet at night | 11 % |
| Patients who reported that the area around their room was "Usually" quiet at night | 36 % |
| Quietness - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Quietness - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 6 or lower on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 15 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 7 or 8 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 27 % |
| Patients who gave their hospital a rating of 9 or 10 on a scale from 0 (lowest) to 10 (highest) | 58 % |
| Overall hospital rating - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Overall hospital rating - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Patients who reported NO, they would probably not or definitely not recommend the hospital | 10 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would definitely recommend the hospital | 56 % |
| Patients who reported YES, they would probably recommend the hospital | 34 % |
| Recommend hospital - linear mean score | Not Applicable |
| Recommend hospital - star rating | Not Applicable |
| Summary star rating | Not Applicable |
